What about a regular MX Linux with AV Linux config?

Help on all MX Re-spins
Message
Author
User avatar
AVLinux
Posts: 2922
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 1:15 am

Re: What about a regular MX Linux with AV Linux config?

#41 Post by AVLinux »

@MelodyNaive

You can certainly install other Desktop Environments into AV Linux if you want from the MX Package Installer, some Menu items and customizations may not appear as they are intended, if you remove Thunar (ie install KDE with Dolphin) you will lose dozens of handy specialized Custom Actions... I test installed XFCE4 on my development box and it worked as expected although I uninstalled it within minutes due to it's terribly broken handling of it's native scaling on a 4K monitor.. :rolleyes:

User avatar
MelodyNaive
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2024 2:53 pm

Re: What about a regular MX Linux with AV Linux config?

#42 Post by MelodyNaive »

AVLinux wrote: Wed May 29, 2024 5:46 pm @MelodyNaive

You can certainly install other Desktop Environments into AV Linux if you want from the MX Package Installer, some Menu items and customizations may not appear as they are intended, if you remove Thunar you will lose dozens of specialized Custom Actions... I test installed XFCE4 on my development box and it worked as expected although I uninstalled it within minutes due to it's terribly broken handling of it's native scaling on a 4K monitor.. :rolleyes:
Thank you. I don't really know what is included in a DE. Seems like all the same apps are around when I switched. I might be limited by using a 10yo laptop.

What does "udev-rules-ardour" do? I get that it puts a config file(s) in /etc/udev/rules.d. But I just installed it in this MX23 xfce that I fixed up using the realtime quick config's help, to be supposedly audio ready. I rebooted & now I can't find any difference in how Ardour interacts with my hardware (only DAW I am using right now with a laptop & audio interface) than before.

I did already spend a bunch of time with the pipewire qpwgraph hooking up in & outs, so maybe udev-rules-ardour woulda done that for me default? Tho last night I did:

copy /usr/share/doc/pipewire/examples/ld.so.conf.d/pipewire-jack-x86*.conf
to
/etc/ld.so.conf.d/
then did ldconfig to get it working last night. IIrc I couldn't get ardour to use pipewire through its JACK option (audacity has a pipewire option but not ardour). A redditor gave that command to someone & it worked for me. It supposedly tells programs that use jack to use pipewire.

Does udev-rules-ardour accomplish something similar thru a different means?

User avatar
AVLinux
Posts: 2922
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 1:15 am

Re: What about a regular MX Linux with AV Linux config?

#43 Post by AVLinux »

So you see that AV Linux has several tweaks and conveniences that MX doesn't do by default.. ;)

'udev-rules-ardour' has nothing to do with routing Audio, they are a set of udev rules to enable better hardware performance of certain specific devices and improve Ardour's latency by setting udev permissions for CPU's that support setting latency dma variables.

https://github.com/Ardour/ardour/tree/master/tools/udev

Tony45
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2024 10:00 pm

Re: What about a regular MX Linux with AV Linux config?

#44 Post by Tony45 »

@siamhe
Thanks for the link. That's what I was looking for.
I had been at bandshed-net several times, but didn't see the 21.3.
I must be getting old. Maybe using binoculars instead of reading glasses might help

User avatar
siamhie
Global Moderator
Posts: 3216
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:45 pm

Re: What about a regular MX Linux with AV Linux config?

#45 Post by siamhie »

Tony45 wrote: Wed May 29, 2024 8:53 pm @siamhe
Thanks for the link. That's what I was looking for.
I had been at bandshed-net several times, but didn't see the 21.3.
I must be getting old. Maybe using binoculars instead of reading glasses might help

@Tony45 You won't find any links to MX-21 AVL on the web site because he is supporting the MX-23 version now.
I just back tracked the hosting link and saw the MX-21 directory.
This is my Fluxbox . There are many others like it, but this one is mine. My Fluxbox is my best friend. It is my life.
I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my Fluxbox is useless. Without my Fluxbox, I am useless.

Tony45
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2024 10:00 pm

Re: What about a regular MX Linux with AV Linux config?

#46 Post by Tony45 »

@siamhie
Yes, I realized this later on.
Regardless, Thank you.
I had a look at it on USB and I like what I see.
EDIT
I installed on HD + fully updated + working snapshot
All seems OK
Thanks

cinclus
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2016 5:35 am

Re: What about a regular MX Linux with AV Linux config?

#47 Post by cinclus »

siamhie wrote: Wed May 29, 2024 11:53 pm ...
@Tony45 You won't find any links to MX-21 AVL on the web site because he is supporting the MX-23 version now.
I just back tracked the hosting link and saw the MX-21 directory.
Where should I upload AV_Linux_MX_Edition-21.3_ahs_x64.iso?

User avatar
Eadwine Rose
Administrator
Posts: 14429
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:10 am

Re: What about a regular MX Linux with AV Linux config?

#48 Post by Eadwine Rose »

Are you intending to share a respin of AVL?
MX-23.6_x64 July 31 2023 * 6.1.0-34amd64 ext4 Xfce 4.20.0 * 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.216.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030

cinclus
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2016 5:35 am

Re: What about a regular MX Linux with AV Linux config?

#49 Post by cinclus »

Before I would have to investigate if I can solve my problem with MS Office under wine in that version.
Other question would be if I could use pipewie/wireplumber.

User avatar
AVLinux
Posts: 2922
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 1:15 am

Re: What about a regular MX Linux with AV Linux config?

#50 Post by AVLinux »

AVL 21.3 uses the former JACK/Pulse/pajackconnect Audio setup which worked very well at the time, it is based on MX-21 and Debian 11 (oldstable) and unless you want to root around in 'debian-backports-sloppy' or compile PipeWire and new dependencies for yourself you will not get up to date PipeWire Packages in there, even mighty @Stevo isn't maintaining Pipewire for MX-21 based systems because the supporting dependencies have changed too much. I'm fine with and encourage using MX's Snapshot to craft your own AV Linux build but if you're going to share it with others you will need to make a clear name change and indicate it is a Respin please.

In general I'm extremely puzzled why people gripe about the new AVL-23 Enlightenment Desktop and and vaguely complain they "don't like it" or "can't get things to work" but I get pitifully few specific questions about actual issues like "How do I change the Icon theme?" or "How can I add a new wallpaper?" or "this Program isn't launching" I feel like I receive far more opinions than actual bug reports and I can give usage instructions but I'm not in the business of changing opinions... ;)

Locked

Return to “MX Respins”