6.1 kernel availability  [Solved]

Message
Author
sagsaw
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:43 am

Re: 6.1 kernel availability

#11 Post by sagsaw »

one more

the config no hz full also needs a boot parameter it seems I quote

By default, no CPU will be an adaptive-ticks CPU. The "nohz_full="
boot parameter specifies the adaptive-ticks CPUs. For example,
"nohz_full=1,6-8" says that CPUs 1, 6, 7, and 8 are to be adaptive-ticks
CPUs. Note that you are prohibited from marking all of the CPUs as
adaptive-tick CPUs: At least one non-adaptive-tick CPU must remain
online to handle timekeeping tasks in order to ensure that system calls
like gettimeofday() returns accurate values on adaptive-tick CPUs.
(This is not an issue for CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE=y because there are no
running user processes to observe slight drifts in clock rate.)
Therefore, the boot CPU is prohibited from entering adaptive-ticks
mode. Specifying a "nohz_full=" mask that includes the boot CPU will
result in a boot-time error message, and the boot CPU will be removed
from the mask.


quoted from

https://android.googlesource.com/kernel ... /NO_HZ.txt :alien:

so does mx set these parameters in boot line jn grub automatically???

sagsaw
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:43 am

Re: 6.1 kernel availability

#12 Post by sagsaw »

Also ubuntu has a lowlatency kernel which is a bit different from the RT lernel available in debian n mxlinux
Last edited by sagsaw on Fri Mar 10, 2023 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 14432
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:07 pm

Re: 6.1 kernel availability

#13 Post by Stevo »

We rebuild the Liquorix kernel for users that want low latency; currently it's also 6.1 in the 19 and 21 AHS repos.

I also recently put an amd64 port of the Siduction 6.2.2 kernel in MX 21's ahs-staging section, for anyone that want to play with that.
MXPI = MX Package Installer
QSI = Quick System Info from menu
The MX Test repository is mostly backports; not the same as Debian testing

sagsaw
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:43 am

Re: 6.1 kernel availability

#14 Post by sagsaw »

not found in synaptics search

installed 6.1mx from ahs but liquorix not found

http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ bullseye main ahs

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 14432
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:07 pm

Re: 6.1 kernel availability

#15 Post by Stevo »

Ummm--what did you search for? And in what in the synaptic search settings?

Did you try "liquorix" in Quick Search?

Or try MXPI at all?
MXPI = MX Package Installer
QSI = Quick System Info from menu
The MX Test repository is mostly backports; not the same as Debian testing

sagsaw
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:43 am

Re: 6.1 kernel availability

#16 Post by sagsaw »

Stevo wrote: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:48 pm Ummm--what did you search for? And in what in the synaptic search settings?

Did you try "liquorix" in Quick Search?

Or try MXPI at all?
actually i have installed debian and am trying to install mx and liquorix kernels on it ...

succeded in installing mx kernel via ahs but liquorix not to be found in search via synaptic package manager

http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ bullseye main ahs

mx is installed on my other machines 64 bit

tequila
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2020 6:42 am

Re: 6.1 kernel availability

#17 Post by tequila »

Stevo wrote: Thu Mar 09, 2023 3:12 pm We rebuild the Liquorix kernel for users that want low latency; currently it's also 6.1 in the 19 and 21 AHS repos.

I also recently put an amd64 port of the Siduction 6.2.2 kernel in MX 21's ahs-staging section, for anyone that want to play with that.
Thank you,the Siduction 6.2.2 kernel works very well,probably better than the Liquorix kernel...

sagsaw
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:43 am

Re: 6.1 kernel availability

#18 Post by sagsaw »

Stevo wrote: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:48 pm Ummm--what did you search for? And in what in the synaptic search settings?

Did you try "liquorix" in Quick Search?

Or try MXPI at all?
Also does liquorix 6.1 bullseye not support i386?

Post Reply

Return to “General”