What distro do you favour? Beside MX/Antix of course...

For interesting topics. But remember this is a Linux Forum. Do not post offensive topics that are meant to cause trouble with other members or are derogatory towards people of different genders, race, color, minors (this includes nudity and sex), politics or religion. Let's try to keep peace among the community and for visitors.

No spam on this or any other forums please! If you post advertisements on these forums, your account may be deleted.

Do not copy and paste entire or even up to half of someone else's words or articles into posts. Post only a few sentences or a paragraph and make sure to include a link back to original words or article. Otherwise it's copyright infringement.

You can talk about other distros here, but no MX bashing. You can email the developers of MX if you just want to say you dislike or hate MX.
Message
Author
User avatar
Duliwi
Posts: 1178
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:34 am

Re: What distro do you favour? Beside MX/Antix of course...

#41 Post by Duliwi »

rickyraccoon wrote: Mon Sep 12, 2022 11:42 am I like the automated version upgrades- one click takes you up to the next revision number.
What do you mean with this? Does this mean, that Linux Mint supports the possibility to upgrade from one main version to another? This is something is miss in MX: A supported upgrade possibility, so that we can upgrade from MX-19 to MX-21.
Does Mint have this?

(Please note: I only know MX. This was my first and only dist. until now.)

User avatar
jeffreyC
Posts: 522
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 10:39 am

Re: What distro do you favour? Beside MX/Antix of course...

#42 Post by jeffreyC »

Duliwi wrote: Mon Sep 12, 2022 1:32 pm
rickyraccoon wrote: Mon Sep 12, 2022 11:42 am I like the automated version upgrades- one click takes you up to the next revision number.
What do you mean with this? Does this mean, that Linux Mint supports the possibility to upgrade from one main version to another? This is something is miss in MX: A supported upgrade possibility, so that we can upgrade from MX-19 to MX-21.
Does Mint have this?

(Please note: I only know MX. This was my first and only dist. until now.)
Yes, Linux Mint has a tool that does exactly that.

User avatar
handy
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 2:00 pm

Re: What distro do you favour? Beside MX/Antix of course...

#43 Post by handy »

I didn't know that Mint could do that. Very well done Mint. Shame they use systemd...
MSI: MAG B560 TORP', i5, RAM 16GB, GTX 1070 Ti 12GB, M2 238GB + USB, MX-23 Fb to Openbx
Lenovo: Ideapad 520S, i5, RAM 8GB, GPU i620, HDD 1TB, MX-23 Fb - Openbx
Clevo: P150SM-A, i7, RAM 16GB, nVidia 8600, 2x 1TB HDD & M.2 256 GB, MX-23 Fb - Openbx

MXRobo
Posts: 1821
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:09 pm

Re: What distro do you favour? Beside MX/Antix of course...

#44 Post by MXRobo »

I hope this isn’t too off topic, and I haven’t tried it yet, but I’ll probably try Titan linux on a low resource laptop.
Supposedly, it’s a keletal KDE plasma and ships with very minimal apps, (IIRC, no LibreOffice), Debian Stable, they’re still adding to the toolbox.
Maybe somewhat similar to this, sans KDE:https://sourceforge.net/projects/mx-lin ... X-Minimal/

Helen-Earth
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat May 23, 2020 8:17 pm

Re: What distro do you favour? Beside MX/Antix of course...

#45 Post by Helen-Earth »

Archlabs is my daily driver. Great community with very talented people's. (yet it is just another linux system)

MX-ahs wildflower
any Debian system is a lot of work for me to setup. As I want the latest programs, with Debian that means git & source code installs that 's how one learns & make Linux your own. Definitely Fun side of Debian
I have no need at all for the bells & whistles , gui desktops. But in saying this it is Good for windows users & any players that want a well supported system. (yet it is just another linux system)

Huckleberry Finn

Re: What distro do you favour? Beside MX/Antix of course...

#46 Post by Huckleberry Finn »

jeffreyC wrote: Mon Sep 12, 2022 2:02 pm
Duliwi wrote: Mon Sep 12, 2022 1:32 pm
rickyraccoon wrote: Mon Sep 12, 2022 11:42 am I like the automated version upgrades- one click takes you up to the next revision number.
What do you mean with this? Does this mean, that Linux Mint supports the possibility to upgrade from one main version to another? This is something is miss in MX: A supported upgrade possibility, so that we can upgrade from MX-19 to MX-21.
Does Mint have this?

(Please note: I only know MX. This was my first and only dist. until now.)
Yes, Linux Mint has a tool that does exactly that.
Yes, but just like MX & Debian relation: Providing that the Ubuntu base is still the same. When it's a new Ubuntu base you need to fresh install.

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7773
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: What distro do you favour? Beside MX/Antix of course...

#47 Post by asqwerth »

Huckleberry Finn wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 4:36 am
Yes, but just like MX & Debian relation: Providing that the Ubuntu base is still the same. When it's a new Ubuntu base you need to fresh install.
Not that accurate. I believe Mint does provide a upgrade path from LTS to LTS version, which they reduced to a graphical interface button.

Even from days of old (maybe 2010 onwards), I recall Kubuntu LTS already having that type of upgrade path***. I used to run Kubuntu LTS on my old ASUS laptop and I recall using that upgrade path twice, ie I had 3 different releases of Kubuntu LTS on my laptop. However, after my second running of the upgrade path, the 3rd LTS release of Kubuntu didn't run too well on my machine. It was glitchy and I wiped it. I think too much cruft was left behind after 2 rounds of release upgrades, maybe new release packages weren't a 1-for-1 replacement for old packages, etc.

Same with the old Netrunner (Ubuntu KDE-based). I'd gone through 2 upgrades (15, 16 17) on my PC, and again the 3rd release version was just not running right so I got rid of it.

After that, my view was that for Debian/Ubuntu-based fixed release distros, clean installs were better. I could always backup or reuse /home, but the system packages were best clean-installed.

You can also do release upgrades in vanilla Debian if you just manually change the repos to the next stable release when it's available. How long it will last without some issues setting in however, I don't know. Perhaps it'll be fine if you mainly stuck with what was in Debian's own repos.


But MX is different:
1. uses systemd-shim in order to have both init systems co-exist
2. backports lots of packages, including things like graphics-related drivers and packages
3. uses tricks to make sure some things that require systemd will still work in sysv (eg network manager, getting the action buttons in sddm login screen to work in modern themes)

Those things may or may not interfere with the normal upgrade path of vanilla Debian. See the excerpt below from MX website:

https://mxlinux.org/mx-repos/
Debian Stable is a wonderful solid distribution that can be upgraded in place from version to version automatically as long as the Debian Stable repos are used exclusively. MX uses Debian Stable as a base, but updates a lot of the userland programs & libraries, and backports newer programs from testing by building them against the Stable base. That gives a better user experience but interferes with Debian’s dist-upgrade path. Our current choice is to stick with sysvinit instead of going to full systemd.

So it’s a trade-off: better desktop user experience at the expense of having to do a quick fresh install (which lets you save /home if desired) when the Debian base changes, typically every 2-3 years

***note: by the provision of an upgrade path, I mean that I actually got a notification in the panel that a new version of Kubuntu LTS was available and I could click on something to commence upgrade.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
Duliwi
Posts: 1178
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:34 am

Re: What distro do you favour? Beside MX/Antix of course...

#48 Post by Duliwi »

Thank you for this interesting explanations @asqwerth .

Huckleberry Finn

Re: What distro do you favour? Beside MX/Antix of course...

#49 Post by Huckleberry Finn »

asqwerth wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 6:03 am
Huckleberry Finn wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 4:36 am
Yes, but just like MX & Debian relation: Providing that the Ubuntu base is still the same. When it's a new Ubuntu base you need to fresh install.
Not that accurate. I believe Mint does provide a upgrade path from LTS to LTS version...
That's already what I meant and Mint already uses the LTS as the base. (I did not say : "when there's a new Ubuntu release", but a "new base" which is already known to be LTS)

Say, Mint

18 Sarah was based on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Xenial ..
19 Tara on 18.04 LTS Bionic
20 Ulyana on 20.04 LTS Focal

and so on.. You can do the point upgrades (i.e. from 18.0 to 18.1 , .. 18.3 till 19) but you need a fresh installation when you want to upgrade from Mint 18 to 19 then to 20 ...

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7773
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: What distro do you favour? Beside MX/Antix of course...

#50 Post by asqwerth »

@Huckleberry Finn

i think we mean roughly the same thing. Mint and other Ubuntu based distros may officially offer an upgrade path to the next LTS (or in netrunner's case, the next new) base, but while it may work for one upgrade of base, it may not work indefinitely. And eventually you'll need a fresh install anyway, so that is still the recommended way to upgrade to a new base.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

Post Reply

Return to “General”