Distrowatch review grumbles

For interesting topics. But remember this is a Linux Forum. Do not post offensive topics that are meant to cause trouble with other members or are derogatory towards people of different genders, race, color, minors (this includes nudity and sex), politics or religion. Let's try to keep peace among the community and for visitors.

No spam on this or any other forums please! If you post advertisements on these forums, your account may be deleted.

Do not copy and paste entire or even up to half of someone else's words or articles into posts. Post only a few sentences or a paragraph and make sure to include a link back to original words or article. Otherwise it's copyright infringement.

You can talk about other distros here, but no MX bashing. You can email the developers of MX if you just want to say you dislike or hate MX.
Message
Author
Huckleberry Finn

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#491 Post by Huckleberry Finn »

In the meantime: @Freja : I literally agree with @Adrian

(just the words are funny, that's what I laugh :) )

davemx
Posts: 320
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 2:31 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#492 Post by davemx »

One thing I will never quarrel about in any Distro is the wallpaper. Unless the devs have sneakily added a feature to stop me substituting my own!
Desktop: Mini-Box M350 with Asus H110i-plus motherboard, Pentium G4600 processor, 2TB SSD and 16Gb RAM DDR4-2133
Printer/Scanner: Brother MFC-J5335W
Laptop: Lenovo V15 ADA
Media Centre: Lenovo Q190

User avatar
Mauser
Posts: 1440
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 7:32 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#493 Post by Mauser »

davemx wrote: Mon Apr 18, 2022 6:48 pm One thing I will never quarrel about in any Distro is the wallpaper. Unless the devs have sneakily added a feature to stop me substituting my own!
I agree. Some people are ridiculous. There is no point on criticizing the wall paper because it's easy to change it.
I am command line illiterate. :confused: I copy & paste to the terminal. Liars, Wiseguys, Trolls, and those without manners will be added to my ignore list. :mad:

User avatar
uncle mark
Posts: 851
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:42 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#494 Post by uncle mark »

davemx wrote: Mon Apr 18, 2022 6:48 pm One thing I will never quarrel about in any Distro is the wallpaper. Unless the devs have sneakily added a feature to stop me substituting my own!
I changed it straightaway, but on the first bootup MX21 is gorgeous. First impressions mean something.
Custom build Asus/AMD/nVidia circa 2011 -- MX 19.2 KDE
Acer Aspire 5250 -- MX 21 KDE
Toshiba Satellite C55 -- MX 18.3 Xfce
Assorted Junk -- assorted Linuxes

User avatar
Richard
Posts: 1590
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 9:31 am

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#495 Post by Richard »

I love the fact that even though I change the background,
I can always see the Wildflower identification at boot & login.
It is reassuring that I haven't broken it yet. :)
Thanks, to the devs and @Freja.
Thinkpad T430 & Dell Latitude E7450, both with MX-21.3.1
__kernal 5.10.0-26-amd64 x86_64; Xfce-4.18.0; 8 GB RAM
__Intel Core i5-3380M, Graphics, Audio, Video; & SSDs.
HP Ryzen 5 17-cp3xxx with MX23.4 AHS & Liquorix 6.10-12~mx23ahs amd64

User avatar
Arnox
Posts: 500
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2021 10:50 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#496 Post by Arnox »

It's really not important at all and it's way past time to talk about it now, but for the record, I didn't really like the default wallpaper chosen for MX 21. Not necessarily because it has flowers in it, but simply because I've seen much better flower pics.

Here's a nice macro shot for example from Windows 8.1 Professional.

Image

You could also do a landscape with wildflowers. This is a picture from Wolchulsan, South Korea taken by NathanielMerz.

Image

EDIT: Is there any way in phpBB to resize these for display in the forums?

EDIT2: Fixed the image sizes.
Last edited by Arnox on Thu Apr 21, 2022 7:28 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
AVLinux
Posts: 2922
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 1:15 am

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#497 Post by AVLinux »

@Arnox

Lol, @richb is not going to be happy with you at all!!

People have no idea how much time, work, trial, error and 98%-complete-and-then-abandoned ideas come into play when preparing the aesthetic of a Distro especially one as high profile as MX. I'm sure @asqwerth invested more hours in simply selecting the User wallpaper submissions than we could believe let alone pulling together an entire incredible theme.. A Linux reviewer or critic who complains about the wallpaper, or the icon theme or the system font is not worth listening to... How can somebody who doesn't even have the knowledge or expertise to do a couple of mouse clicks and change any of these things to their liking expect to be listened to as an authority on anything but slackerdom..

Sure we all have opinions and preferences but a Ferrari is a Ferrari whether it's painted red or blue..

User avatar
Freja
Developer
Posts: 728
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 2:15 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#498 Post by Freja »

Yes. There are many excellent photographers and CG artists in the world. I understanding, I can not always win "simple quality" of world's art athletes.

So what is the goodness of Freja? It's probably that my work is unique. However, there are likes and dislikes for unique works. MX is a global OS, so my work doesn't always fit.

This is a wallpaper that was newly designed in consideration of such a series of flows. But, I still need to evolve further.

Image

Basically, in order to make MX the best in the world, asqwerth needs to select the best match for the product from all MX community artists.(Also, as a side note, I'm not interested in "honor of choice".)
In the world filled desire,
I seek only essence, serve for MX.
I just needing only ideal in the art at all.
I want to protect place of rest called MX LINUX. :coffee:
Sony VAIO Pro 11inch Silver (FHD) extrox (MX23)

User avatar
Arnox
Posts: 500
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2021 10:50 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#499 Post by Arnox »

AVLinux wrote: Wed Apr 20, 2022 10:44 pm A Linux reviewer or critic who complains about the wallpaper, or the icon theme or the system font is not worth listening to... How can somebody who doesn't even have the knowledge or expertise to do a couple of mouse clicks and change any of these things to their liking expect to be listened to as an authority on anything but slackerdom.
Again, the wallpaper is really not a big problem in any way whatsoever, and it would indeed be incredibly stupid to slam a distro just because the default aesthetic is not to one's liking, so I absolutely agree with that, but what I see personally is what I see, and I can't really give anything more than that in explanation.
Freja wrote: Wed Apr 20, 2022 11:05 pm This is a wallpaper that was newly designed in consideration of such a series of flows. But, I still need to evolve further.

Image
Actually, I really like this wallpaper.

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10852
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#500 Post by richb »

@Arnox
As Moderator

Forum image rules are: images shall be a maximum of 640 x 620. Larger images disrupt the flow of the topic.I see you are using Imgur. Pick the "Large" image link which meets Forum Requirements. I have removed the img tags. The image can be viewed directly by clicking the image link.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

Locked

Return to “General”