What makes MX better than Debian?

[Procenko]

Can i ask here?

[SwampRabbit]

“better” is subjective, MX isn’t better than Debian, it’s different. Most people will talk about it being more user friendly out of the box, the MX tools, antiX live system, more and updated packages, the community.

For some and what they want to do, Debian may be better, for others MX may be better.

[manyroads]

Every review is subjective... google your way to satisfaction.

[Mauser]

MX is better for the following reasons: easy to install, semi rolling release, some software is newer, larger repositories with more software, tools and tweaks that makes it easy, no systemD, and not locked out of non free or open source software.

[siamhie]

MX is better for the following reasons: easy to install, semi rolling release, some software is newer, larger repositories with more software, tools and tweaks that makes it easy, no systemD, and not locked out of non free or open source software.

systemd is installed but boot defaults to SysV unless you go to advanced options from the boot screen.

[Bamber]

MX is Debian prêt-à-porter.

[Jerry3904]

There are no absolute "better" reasons. Different users have different goals.

[anticapitalista]

MX may be better than Debian, but IMO antiX is EVEN better.

[thinkpadx]

and all this time i thought it was butter.

[Mauser]

MX is better for the following reasons: easy to install, semi rolling release, some software is newer, larger repositories with more software, tools and tweaks that makes it easy, no systemD, and not locked out of non free or open source software.

systemd is installed but boot defaults to SysV unless you go to advanced options from the boot screen.

Wrong! SystemD is disabled by default.