MX-21 beta 2 feedback thread (xfce)

Message
Author
User avatar
dreamer
Posts: 891
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:34 am

Re: MX-21 beta 2 feedback thread (xfce)

#161 Post by dreamer »

@JayM
You should try your problematic apps with the normal Xfce panel plugin called "Window Buttons". We need to know that they work correctly there before we assume it is a Docklike problem. Maybe you already checked that, I don't know.

@asqwerth
In Xfce 4.16 Thunar is always controlled by the window manager. A CSD version of Thunar doesn't exist as far as I know.
Note to self and others: SysVinit is a good option. However if you run into problems try with systemd first. This applies to AppImages, Flatpaks, GitHub packages and even some Debian packages.

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7807
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: MX-21 beta 2 feedback thread (xfce)

#162 Post by asqwerth »

dreamer wrote: Mon Sep 13, 2021 2:17 pm
@asqwerth
In Xfce 4.16 Thunar is always controlled by the window manager. A CSD version of Thunar doesn't exist as far as I know.
The MAIN window of Thunar 4.16 should normally be controlled by xfwm window manager. But note that if you open Thunar's Edit Preferences, you can see that dialogue window is CSD.

The problem with the beta1 and beta2' Thunar was that gtk3-nocsd was installed. Once installed, the default position in MX was to disable noCSD (in MX-Tweak), meaning CSD was enabled. It made Thunar not show the xfwm theme, but instead the window decoration that comes from within the gtk theme. In MX-Comfort, both window decorations are very similar, but you can tell the difference by the window buttons on the top right.

Check the Thunar screenshot from JayM in this thread. viewtopic.php?p=652525#p652525

Compare the window buttons with mine below.
ksnip_20210914-022955.png

Anyway, gtk3-noscd won't be preinstalled with MX21, and Thunar's main window will be back to using xfwm themes.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
entropyfoe
Posts: 615
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:42 am

Re: MX-21 beta 2 feedback thread (xfce)

#163 Post by entropyfoe »

So many posts on these threads, hard to keep track.

I am running the beta2, and wanted to remove the gtk3-nocsd package.

I did not know about the tweaks option.
So I removed in with synaptic, and rebooted.

Behavior seems normal, including that annoying firefox right click anomaly is gone.

-Jay
MX 23.5 on Asus PRIME X470-PRO
AMD Ryzen 3600X (12 threads @ 3.8 GHz)
32 Gig DDR4 3600 (Crucial CL 16)
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Samsung 970 NVMe nvme0n1 P1-3=MX-23.5, P4=testing
Samsung 980 NVMe =1TB Data, plus 2TB WD =backups
on-board ethernet & sound

User avatar
dreamer
Posts: 891
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:34 am

Re: MX-21 beta 2 feedback thread (xfce)

#164 Post by dreamer »

asqwerth wrote: Mon Sep 13, 2021 2:36 pm Anyway, gtk3-noscd won't be preinstalled with MX21, and Thunar's main window will be back to using xfwm themes.
I never understood why MX team bothered with gtk3-nocsd when libxfce4ui-nocsd exists and is superior in any way. It was even packaged for Xfce 4.16 temp repo in MX-19. Including gtk3-nocsd is probably the weirdest thing I have seen MX devs do during my time here. It's a relief it will be gone from final. MX is about quality, not hacks - and if hacks are used at least choose the best hacks available. The inclusion of gtk3-nocsd was a mystery to me.
Note to self and others: SysVinit is a good option. However if you run into problems try with systemd first. This applies to AppImages, Flatpaks, GitHub packages and even some Debian packages.

BasicSloth
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2021 3:33 pm

Re: MX-21 beta 2 feedback thread (xfce)

#165 Post by BasicSloth »

Hei @SwampRabbit I'm glad that you care and try to help. I know the problem with the busy days :-)

Yeah I tried it. It works. But honestly, acpi=off is not an option. I did not spend so much money on a 8 core CPU to just use one.

Unfortunately i did not process very well in my subject to analyze segfaults. (busy days problems :-))
I noticed, that i'm not able to reach a GUI when i start in non-uefi. In fact i do not even reach a terminal. Just a blank screen. I guess, the GPU is not working there, cause the screen is looking for a source. That happens also with acpi=off.

I just will give it another try with acpi=ht.

Edit: acpi=ht doesn't work. I reach the GUI. But Fall back to the login screen. Entering demo user and pw leads to black screen (but GPU working as there is the score blinking in the left top corner)
Last edited by BasicSloth on Mon Sep 13, 2021 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22112
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: MX-21 beta 2 feedback thread (xfce)

#166 Post by dolphin_oracle »

dreamer wrote: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:20 pm
asqwerth wrote: Mon Sep 13, 2021 2:36 pm Anyway, gtk3-noscd won't be preinstalled with MX21, and Thunar's main window will be back to using xfwm themes.
I never understood why MX team bothered with gtk3-nocsd when libxfce4ui-nocsd exists and is superior in any way. It was even packaged for Xfce 4.16 temp repo in MX-19. Including gtk3-nocsd is probably the weirdest thing I have seen MX devs do during my time here. It's a relief it will be gone from final. MX is about quality, not hacks - and if hacks are used at least choose the best hacks available. The inclusion of gtk3-nocsd was a mystery to me.
we bothered because there was a movement to have such a thing for apps other than xfce apps. its null and void now, but apparently those libs are nuts even if you have them "disabled:. kind of ridiculous that they are even in the debian repo TBH. they were only included on beta 2 by accident concerning a syncing of our git repos and wasn't caught till after release.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
manyroads
Posts: 2657
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Dark Theme Issues

#167 Post by manyroads »

imschmeg wrote: Mon Sep 13, 2021 1:32 pm For virtualbox, I am able to get a dark theme by starting it with command line args "-style kvantum", and by having ~/.config/kvantum.kvconfig be:

Code: Select all

[General]
theme=KvSimplicityDark
This also seems to work for mx-tools. It does not work for any of the mx-tool components either via addind the start argument to the desktop files or by adding the applications to kvantum. Oh well. It is some progress.
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - ManyRoads Genealogy -or- eirenicon llc. (geeky stuff)
i3wm, bspwm, hlwm, dwm, spectrwm ~ Linux #449130
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken

User avatar
dreamer
Posts: 891
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:34 am

Re: MX-21 beta 2 feedback thread (xfce)

#168 Post by dreamer »

@dolphin_oracle
You are a great guy that do a ton of work and seem to be able to do anything. I'm not here to argue. I guess you do know that third party apps are easy to use with xfwm in Xfce 4.16 with:

Code: Select all

$ xfconf-query -c xsettings -p /Gtk/DialogsUseHeader -s false
My feeling is that MX devs maybe took it too far by letting Xfce put headerbars on LibreOffice and other third party applications.
Note to self and others: SysVinit is a good option. However if you run into problems try with systemd first. This applies to AppImages, Flatpaks, GitHub packages and even some Debian packages.

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22112
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: MX-21 beta 2 feedback thread (xfce)

#169 Post by dolphin_oracle »

dreamer wrote: Mon Sep 13, 2021 4:06 pm @dolphin_oracle
You are a great guy that do a ton of work and seem to be able to do anything. I'm not here to argue. I guess you do know that third party apps are easy to use with xfwm in Xfce 4.16 with:

Code: Select all

$ xfconf-query -c xsettings -p /Gtk/DialogsUseHeader -s false
My feeling is that MX devs maybe took it too far by letting Xfce put headerbars on LibreOffice and other third party applications.
What was wanted was a solution that didn’t require xfce but thanks for the info.

@dreamer is that xfconf-query code supposed to do anything without libxfce4ui-nocsd installed or is libxfce4ui-nocsd required?
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22112
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: MX-21 beta 2 feedback thread (xfce)

#170 Post by dolphin_oracle »

I think that really just affects dialog windows, and not even all of those. take a look at the "configure custom actions" dialog in thunar vs. the regular thunar preferences dialog for an example.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

Locked

Return to “General”