OK good. Were you able to just apt update and apt upgrade? Did you have to manually deal with anything?MAYBL8 wrote: Wed Jan 06, 2021 4:39 pmCode: Select all
$ inxi -r Repos: No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list 1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mx.list 1: deb http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ buster main non-free 2: deb http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ buster ahs Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/npreining.list 1: deb https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/npreining:/debian-kde:/apps2012/Debian_Unstable/ ./ No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/various.list
MX Modified - Latest MX KDE 5.22 Using MX21 beta
- andyprough
- MX Packager
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:16 pm
Re: MX Modified - KDE 5.20.4 on MX (UNSUPPORTED - extremely experimental)
Primary Computer - Commodore 64: Processor - MOS 6510/8500, 1.023MHz; Memory - 64kb RAM, 20kB ROM - 8k BASIC V2, 8k Kernel, 4k Character ROM; Display output - 320x200, 16 colours; OS - BASIC V2.0; Weight: 1.8kg
Re: MX Modified - KDE 5.20.4 on MX (UNSUPPORTED - extremely experimental)
I didn't document the process.
If I remember I had to update several times and remove some packages . I think in my previous posts I documented what I removed.
If you want I can go through the process and document it?
If I remember I had to update several times and remove some packages . I think in my previous posts I documented what I removed.
If you want I can go through the process and document it?
- andyprough
- MX Packager
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:16 pm
Re: MX Modified - KDE 5.20.4 on MX (UNSUPPORTED - extremely experimental)
That's OK. I updated the first post of this thread with your current repos and with the latest version number.MAYBL8 wrote: Wed Jan 06, 2021 4:47 pm I didn't document the process.
If I remember I had to update several times and remove some packages . I think in my previous posts I documented what I removed.
If you want I can go through the process and document it?
Exciting times! Everything running OK now?
Primary Computer - Commodore 64: Processor - MOS 6510/8500, 1.023MHz; Memory - 64kb RAM, 20kB ROM - 8k BASIC V2, 8k Kernel, 4k Character ROM; Display output - 320x200, 16 colours; OS - BASIC V2.0; Weight: 1.8kg
Re: MX Modified - KDE 5.20.5 on MX (UNSUPPORTED - extremely experimental)
I haven't tested everything but it seems to be working as expected.
Some issues with some themes but there are so many and theme issues in KDE have always been there since they are user created.
I would think that if it is a global theme it would include everything with it like icons and cursors etc but that is not always the case.
Some issues with some themes but there are so many and theme issues in KDE have always been there since they are user created.
I would think that if it is a global theme it would include everything with it like icons and cursors etc but that is not always the case.
Re: MX Modified - KDE 5.20.5 on MX (UNSUPPORTED - extremely experimental)
I don't expect the MX tools to work the way I am installed but I thought I would try the MXPI and got this error:
Code: Select all
$ Starting /usr/bin/mx-packageinstaller
mx-packageinstaller version: 21.1.02
+++ void MainWindow::setProgressDialog() +++
+++ void MainWindow::setup() +++
dpkg-query -f '${Version}' -W flatpak
"1.8.4-2"
cat /etc/debian_version | cut -f1 -d'.'
"bullseye/sid"
Could not detect Debian version
- andyprough
- MX Packager
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:16 pm
Re: MX Modified - KDE 5.20.5 on MX (UNSUPPORTED - extremely experimental)
MXPI is going to be looking for the MX Testing and the Debian Buster repos - probably won't start without them enabled. And if you did enable them and use it to install a package, MXPI would probably pull in a Buster version of some libraries or some gcc package or something as part of the install and then you'd be completely hosed.MAYBL8 wrote: Tue Jan 12, 2021 9:32 am I don't expect the MX tools to work the way I am installed but I thought I would try the MXPI and got this error:Code: Select all
$ Starting /usr/bin/mx-packageinstaller mx-packageinstaller version: 21.1.02 +++ void MainWindow::setProgressDialog() +++ +++ void MainWindow::setup() +++ dpkg-query -f '${Version}' -W flatpak "1.8.4-2" cat /etc/debian_version | cut -f1 -d'.' "bullseye/sid" Could not detect Debian version
Primary Computer - Commodore 64: Processor - MOS 6510/8500, 1.023MHz; Memory - 64kb RAM, 20kB ROM - 8k BASIC V2, 8k Kernel, 4k Character ROM; Display output - 320x200, 16 colours; OS - BASIC V2.0; Weight: 1.8kg
Re: MX Modified - KDE 5.20.5 on MX (UNSUPPORTED - extremely experimental)
I think I had it working before my last rebuild of the repos. And you are correct about bringing in buster packages.
I probably caused some of my own issues before due to being a frankendebian.
I have a stable sid right now so I am not going to rock the boat.
I probably caused some of my own issues before due to being a frankendebian.
I have a stable sid right now so I am not going to rock the boat.
- andyprough
- MX Packager
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:16 pm
Re: MX Modified - KDE 5.20.5 on MX (UNSUPPORTED - extremely experimental)
Debian Bullseye now has plasma 5.20.4: https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/plasma-desktop
The Bullseye freeze schedule began yesterday with a "transition and (build-)essential freeze". A soft freeze starts on Feb. 12th and a hard freeze on March 12th. I don't know which of those affects the final package version for plasma, but maybe at least 5.20.5 can get in under the deadline. https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html
The Bullseye freeze schedule began yesterday with a "transition and (build-)essential freeze". A soft freeze starts on Feb. 12th and a hard freeze on March 12th. I don't know which of those affects the final package version for plasma, but maybe at least 5.20.5 can get in under the deadline. https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html
Primary Computer - Commodore 64: Processor - MOS 6510/8500, 1.023MHz; Memory - 64kb RAM, 20kB ROM - 8k BASIC V2, 8k Kernel, 4k Character ROM; Display output - 320x200, 16 colours; OS - BASIC V2.0; Weight: 1.8kg
Re: MX Modified - KDE 5.20.5 on MX (UNSUPPORTED - extremely experimental)
Bullseye will have:
- Plasma 5.20.5
- Apps 20.12.0/1 (with exception of PIM which remains at 20.08)
- Frameworks 5.77 or 5.78 (experimental has already 5.78, but I am not sure we will push that to unstable/testing)
- Plasma 5.20.5
- Apps 20.12.0/1 (with exception of PIM which remains at 20.08)
- Frameworks 5.77 or 5.78 (experimental has already 5.78, but I am not sure we will push that to unstable/testing)
- andyprough
- MX Packager
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:16 pm
Re: MX Modified - KDE 5.20.5 on MX (UNSUPPORTED - extremely experimental)
That's excellent news.norbert wrote: Wed Jan 13, 2021 1:10 pm Bullseye will have:
- Plasma 5.20.5
- Apps 20.12.0/1 (with exception of PIM which remains at 20.08)
- Frameworks 5.77 or 5.78 (experimental has already 5.78, but I am not sure we will push that to unstable/testing)
Will you continue to help package beyond 5.20.5 for Sid, Norbert? I'm wondering if the MX devs could tie their Qt apps to your repos instead of Debian Stable for MX 21, allowing them to keep up with the latest plasma versions.
Primary Computer - Commodore 64: Processor - MOS 6510/8500, 1.023MHz; Memory - 64kb RAM, 20kB ROM - 8k BASIC V2, 8k Kernel, 4k Character ROM; Display output - 320x200, 16 colours; OS - BASIC V2.0; Weight: 1.8kg