Distrowatch review grumbles

For interesting topics. But remember this is a Linux Forum. Do not post offensive topics that are meant to cause trouble with other members or are derogatory towards people of different genders, race, color, minors (this includes nudity and sex), politics or religion. Let's try to keep peace among the community and for visitors.

No spam on this or any other forums please! If you post advertisements on these forums, your account may be deleted.

Do not copy and paste entire or even up to half of someone else's words or articles into posts. Post only a few sentences or a paragraph and make sure to include a link back to original words or article. Otherwise it's copyright infringement.

You can talk about other distros here, but no MX bashing. You can email the developers of MX if you just want to say you dislike or hate MX.
Message
Author
User avatar
rob.chaffe
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:17 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#411 Post by rob.chaffe »

JayM wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 7:33 am That's just based on click-throughs from DistroWatch to the distro's websites...
From:
https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=popularity
They simply show the number of times a distribution page on DistroWatch.com was accessed each day, nothing more.

Rob

User avatar
andyprough
MX Packager
Posts: 918
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:16 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#412 Post by andyprough »

Gerson wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:58 amI don't trust the statistics of DistroWatch.
There's nothing not to trust. It's the average number of times someone clicks on a link each day. They've been amazingly consistent over the years. SuSE and RedHat and Debian fought for dominance in the early 2000's, and then Ubuntu landed on the scene and dominated for a number of years, and then Mint. In recent years it's been a battle for the top between Mint, Manjaro and MX, whose high per-day click numbers are backed up by the fact that those three distros are reviewed by DW readers more than twice as often as any other distro except Debian. Their numbers are thoroughly trustworthy.
Primary Computer - Commodore 64: Processor - MOS 6510/8500, 1.023MHz; Memory - 64kb RAM, 20kB ROM - 8k BASIC V2, 8k Kernel, 4k Character ROM; Display output - 320x200, 16 colours; OS - BASIC V2.0; Weight: 1.8kg

SwampRabbit
Posts: 3602
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:02 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#413 Post by SwampRabbit »

andyprough wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 11:59 am It's the average number of times someone clicks on a link each day.
Not just that, but it is clicks per IP, so gaming the system is pretty hard. Which is why its funny when people say its rigged and what not.

MX may not be the most used, or most popular based on user installs and such, but we are obviously getting the most attention and interest.
You can look at the download stats too... those numbers are pretty amazing and reinforce the Distrowatch stats.

Just SourceForge - Downloads: 16,886 This Week ... and its only Wednesday lol.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mx-lin ... iod=weekly
The KDE release plays a big part in that, last week prior to the KDE release we only had 15,404, but that is still a big number for weekly downloads.
NEW USERS START HERE FAQS, MX Manual, and How to Break Your System - Don't use Ubuntu PPAs! Always post your Quick System Info (QSI) when asking for help.

User avatar
Michael-IDA
Posts: 359
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2019 8:00 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#414 Post by Michael-IDA »

SwampRabbit wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:27 pm Just SourceForge - Downloads: 16,886 This Week ... and its only Wednesday lol.
And SourceForge downloads do not include any torrent downloads, correct? Meaning that the SourceForge is low too boot...
NIH Cancer Study: The group supplemented with both vitamins and fenbendazole exhibited significant (P = 0.009) inhibition of tumor growth.
The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck...
... is the day they make a vacuum cleaner.

SwampRabbit
Posts: 3602
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:02 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#415 Post by SwampRabbit »

Michael-IDA wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:48 pm And SourceForge downloads do not include any torrent downloads, correct? Meaning that the SourceForge is low too boot...
I believe so, I seeded almost 17GB prior to stopping to use that particular computer for something else.
I don't track the torrent stats, but we do have them somewhere??? I do know that when I stopped I wasn't getting many leechers, maybe like 2-8 at a time. We had about 54 seeders.

I put the system seeding on a semi-open VLAN, but I think between me requiring encryption, and my one IPS likes to drop stuff in the null bucket a lot for 5-10mins at a time... I don't think I was an attractive seeder.
My wife tells me all the time that I am... but I don't trust her. :p
NEW USERS START HERE FAQS, MX Manual, and How to Break Your System - Don't use Ubuntu PPAs! Always post your Quick System Info (QSI) when asking for help.

User avatar
Michael-IDA
Posts: 359
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2019 8:00 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#416 Post by Michael-IDA »

SwampRabbit wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:54 pm
Michael-IDA wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:48 pm And SourceForge downloads do not include any torrent downloads, correct? Meaning that the SourceForge is low too boot...
My wife tells me all the time that I am... but I don't trust her. :p
*Snort*

These numbers are not reliable, half the numbers are missing, and these are the only 2 iso's I'm seeding. For what it's worth:

Code: Select all

MX-19.2_ahs_x64.iso
Peers Downloads Tracker
 250    N/A           http://l2.mxrepo.com:6969/announce
 129    232           http://it.mxrepo.com:6969/announce

MX-19.2_x64.iso
Peers Downloads Tracker
 693    N/A           http://l2.mxrepo.com:6969/announce
 200    691           http://it.mxrepo.com:6969/announce
NIH Cancer Study: The group supplemented with both vitamins and fenbendazole exhibited significant (P = 0.009) inhibition of tumor growth.
The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck...
... is the day they make a vacuum cleaner.

tony37
Posts: 1306
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2020 12:34 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#417 Post by tony37 »

Gerson wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:58 am It is noteworthy that the vast majority of distributions have been trending downward for several days, even with recent versions.
it's summer

User avatar
jj1j1
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue May 28, 2019 3:49 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#418 Post by jj1j1 »

SwampRabbit wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:27 pm
andyprough wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 11:59 am It's the average number of times someone clicks on a link each day.
Not just that, but it is clicks per IP, so gaming the system is pretty hard. Which is why its funny when people say its rigged and what not.

MX may not be the most used, or most popular based on user installs and such, but we are obviously getting the most attention and interest.
You can look at the download stats too... those numbers are pretty amazing and reinforce the Distrowatch stats.

Just SourceForge - Downloads: 16,886 This Week ... and its only Wednesday lol.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mx-lin ... iod=weekly
The KDE release plays a big part in that, last week prior to the KDE release we only had 15,404, but that is still a big number for weekly downloads.
All a person/dev needs to do is spoof their ip and they can add clicks all day long.
True freedom is never asking the question; Am I free?

SwampRabbit
Posts: 3602
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:02 pm

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#419 Post by SwampRabbit »

jj1j1 wrote: Mon Aug 31, 2020 5:04 pm All a person/dev needs to do is spoof their ip and they can add clicks all day long.
Ain't nobody got time to "spoof their ip" thousands of times a day to get hits on silly Distrowatch.
Do you even know the amount of work it would take to get the amount of public IPs needed to do this at the scale people are purposing? You're talking bot farm level. And I'm sure Jesse has it set up measures to stop a bombardment of hits coming in constantly, even with randomization, and timing space.

Also didn't you say you quit using MX and weren't going to come to the forums?


Edit: you didn't specifically state that, but you essentially stated you weren't going to use MX because of some strange thing you are trying to undo in the Firefox we ship.
Last edited by SwampRabbit on Mon Aug 31, 2020 5:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NEW USERS START HERE FAQS, MX Manual, and How to Break Your System - Don't use Ubuntu PPAs! Always post your Quick System Info (QSI) when asking for help.

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 23059
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Distrowatch review grumbles

#420 Post by Jerry3904 »

Agreed: why troll?

I have seen entire Twitter streams dedicated to the idea that the only explanation for our DW positions is that "everybody knows" that we game the system. Who here has time for that?!
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

Locked

Return to “General”