MX-19.2 KDE Beta 2 Feedback Thread

Message
Author
User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22114
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: MX-19.2 KDE Beta 2 Feedback Thread

#231 Post by dolphin_oracle »

tony37 wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2020 5:55 am One thing I noticed now that I installed the beta to hard drive is that /boot/efi is not 'locked', like in any other distro I've seen. Is this intentional? And funnily the 'changed' and 'opened' dates are set to 1/1/1970
what do you mean "locked".?

its a fat32 partition.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

tony37
Posts: 1306
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2020 12:34 pm

Re: MX-19.2 KDE Beta 2 Feedback Thread

#232 Post by tony37 »

dolphin_oracle wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2020 8:43 am
tony37 wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2020 5:55 am One thing I noticed now that I installed the beta to hard drive is that /boot/efi is not 'locked', like in any other distro I've seen. Is this intentional? And funnily the 'changed' and 'opened' dates are set to 1/1/1970
what do you mean "locked".?

its a fat32 partition.
I mean the lock you see in Dolphin like on /root or /lost+found
In my fstab I have

Code: Select all

UUID=6E90-22EA /boot/efi vfat defaults,noatime,dmask=0002,fmask=0113 0 0
Normally I have umask=0077 there

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 12634
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX-19.2 KDE Beta 2 Feedback Thread

#233 Post by fehlix »

tony37 wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2020 8:49 am In my fstab I have

Code: Select all

UUID=6E90-22EA /boot/efi vfat defaults,noatime,dmask=0002,fmask=0113 0 0
Normally I have umask=0077 there
It's read-only for the user, that's "locked" enough and it helps for troubleshooting.

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7810
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: MX-19.2 KDE Beta 2 Feedback Thread

#234 Post by asqwerth »

dolphin_oracle wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2020 8:42 am
asqwerth wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2020 5:29 am The login molecule splash (Quark) has reverted back to the standard kde plasma logo splash.

I think it is due to the MX Look and Feel global theme's internal default configs for the things that aren't specifically set. I applied the global theme to test it, and that's where the change happened.
I've messed around with a lot of themes, and haven't seen this.

but it very possible. if a look-and-feel theme doesn't have something defined, then that thing doesn't change. asqwerth educated us on that with the icons.
OK, comparing with the Sweet global theme, it would appear that you need to have the splash folder dropped into the ...../plasma/look-and-feel/themename/contents subfolder. Not sure if you need to do more, like amend the .js file in the layouts subfolder or something.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

kangburra
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:10 am

Re: MX-19.2 KDE Beta 2 Feedback Thread

#235 Post by kangburra »

I just did a fresh install and asked it to rename the home directory.
It did rename the home directory but then created a file with the username not a directory. This resulted in being unable to login from the GUI and I had to create the home directory manually.

User avatar
sunrat
Posts: 664
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:54 pm

Re: MX-19.2 KDE Beta 2 Feedback Thread

#236 Post by sunrat »

Discover works fine for updates in my Buster/KDE. It shows a coloured dot in a systray widget when updates are available and clicking on that brings up Discover which asks for authentication when you hit the go button. It's not perfect yet and I don't use it to search/install packages but has worked fine for updates. Never looked at Muon.
Would it be feasible to use it instead of MX-Updater?

kangburra
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:10 am

Re: MX-19.2 KDE Beta 2 Feedback Thread

#237 Post by kangburra »

Is there a fix for Kmail? I am guessing it is a known problem and that is why it is not included but it just keeps crashing.

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7810
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: MX-19.2 KDE Beta 2 Feedback Thread

#238 Post by asqwerth »

I could have sworn someone posted about the Desktop effect>> Flip Switch not working even if you assign a specific keyboard shortcut to it, but I can't find that post anymore.

I can confirm that, although on my MX19.2(xfce)+Plasma Standard install, the Flip Switch effect works with Alt-Tab without me even setting any custom keyboard shortcut at all.

Some kde package may be missing from Beta 2.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
chrispop99
Global Moderator
Posts: 3342
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:07 pm

Re: MX-19.2 KDE Beta 2 Feedback Thread

#239 Post by chrispop99 »

The Package Installer still has an entry for the KDE desktop. Might attempting to install that cause a disaster? (I can test if needed.)

Chris
MX Facebook Group Administrator.
Home-built desktop - Core i5 9400, 970 EVO Plus, 8GB
DELL XPS 15
Lots of test machines

User avatar
Adrian
Developer
Posts: 8897
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:42 am

Re: MX-19.2 KDE Beta 2 Feedback Thread

#240 Post by Adrian »

chrispop99 wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:59 am The Package Installer still has an entry for the KDE desktop. Might attempting to install that cause a disaster? (I can test if needed.)

Chris
I think it adds the rest of the KDE applications, I doubt it creates any problems.

Locked

Return to “General”