MX-19 RC1 Feedback thread

Message
Author
User avatar
kmathern
Developer
Posts: 2508
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:26 pm

Re: MX-19 RC1 Feedback thread

#91 Post by kmathern »

winemaker wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2019 5:52 pm Err:2 http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo buster/main amd64 apt-notifier all 19.10.17mx19+1
404 Not Found [IP: 70.40.214.183 80]
Fetched 1,077 kB in 1s (1,385 kB/s)
E: Failed to fetch http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/pool/main/a/a ... +1_all.deb 404 Not Found [IP: 70.40.214.183 80]
E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing?
I sent the 19.10.17mx19+1 update to Tim (timkb4cq) about an hour ago.

It looks like the package list (http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/dists/buster/ ... 4/Packages) got updated to point to the new version, but I don't see that .deb file in the pool folder yet (http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/pool/main/a/apt-notifier/).

User avatar
Srdjan
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:39 pm

Re: MX-19 RC1 Feedback thread

#92 Post by Srdjan »

yeah, just god that message too...

Code: Select all

full upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
   apt-notifier (19.10.08mx19+1 => 19.10.17mx19+1)
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 125 kB of archives.
After this operation, 1,024 B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
Ign:1 http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo buster/main amd64 apt-notifier all 19.10.17mx19+1
Err:1 http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo buster/main amd64 apt-notifier all 19.10.17mx19+1
  404  Not Found [IP: 70.40.214.183 80]
E: Failed to fetch http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/pool/main/a/apt-notifier/apt-notifier_19.10.17mx19+1_all.deb  404  Not Found [IP: 70.40.214.183 80]
E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing?

full upgrade complete (or was canceled)

User avatar
winemaker
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:37 am

Re: MX-19 RC1 Feedback thread

#93 Post by winemaker »

ahhh ok - I was thinkg that when i went out with the dog. thanks,
Last edited by winemaker on Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Laurentius
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 8:44 pm

Re: MX-19 RC1 Feedback thread

#94 Post by Laurentius »

Just after booting from live usb, the mid part of the panel, from window buttons to launchers and workspace switcher does not seem to apply themes. it look light grey while the rest of the panel is dark (checked with different themes) (first image)

Code: Select all

[code]
System:    Host: mx1 Kernel: 4.19.0-6-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 8.3.0 
           parameters: quiet splasht 
           Desktop: Xfce 4.14.1 tk: Gtk 3.24.5 info: xfce4-panel wm: xfwm4 dm: LightDM 1.26.0 
           Distro: MX-19RC1_x64 patito feo October 15  2019 base: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) 
Machine:   Type: Laptop System: Hewlett-Packard product: Compaq Presario CQ40 Notebook PC 
           v: F.31 serial: <filter> Chassis: Compal type: 10 serial: <filter> 
           Mobo: Compal model: 3607 v: 99.97 serial: <filter> BIOS: Hewlett-Packard v: F.31 
           date: 02/03/2009 
Battery:   ID-1: BAT0 charge: 65.3 Wh condition: 95.0/95.0 Wh (100%) volts: 11.1/10.8 
           model: Hewlett-Packard Primary type: Li-ion serial: N/A status: Discharging 
CPU:       Topology: Dual Core model: Pentium T4200 bits: 64 type: MCP arch: Penryn family: 6 
           model-id: 17 (23) stepping: A (10) microcode: A0B L2 cache: 1024 KiB 
           flags: lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 ssse3 bogomips: 7980 
           Speed: 1428 MHz min/max: 1200/2000 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 1363 2: 1379 
           Vulnerabilities: Type: l1tf mitigation: PTE Inversion 
           Type: mds status: Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microcode; SMT disabled 
           Type: meltdown mitigation: PTI 
           Type: spec_store_bypass status: Vulnerable 
           Type: spectre_v1 mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization 
           Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Full generic retpoline, STIBP: disabled, RSB filling 
Graphics:  Device-1: Intel Mobile 4 Series Integrated Graphics vendor: Hewlett-Packard 
           driver: i915 v: kernel bus ID: 00:02.0 chip ID: 8086:2a42 
           Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.4 driver: intel resolution: 1280x800~60Hz 
           OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Mobile Intel GM45 Express v: 2.1 Mesa 18.3.6 
           direct render: Yes 
Audio:     Device-1: Intel 82801I HD Audio vendor: Hewlett-Packard driver: snd_hda_intel 
           v: kernel bus ID: 00:1b.0 chip ID: 8086:293e 
           Sound Server: ALSA v: k4.19.0-6-amd64 
Network:   Device-1: Broadcom Limited BCM4312 802.11b/g LP-PHY vendor: Hewlett-Packard 
           driver: wl v: kernel port: 7000 bus ID: 03:00.0 chip ID: 14e4:4315 
           IF: wlan0 state: dormant mac: <filter> 
           Device-2: Realtek RTL8101/2/6E PCI Express Fast/Gigabit Ethernet 
           vendor: Hewlett-Packard RTL810xE driver: r8169 v: kernel port: 3000 bus ID: 04:00.0 
           chip ID: 10ec:8136 
           IF: eth0 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter> 
Drives:    Local Storage: total: 150.92 GiB used: 101.68 GiB (67.4%) 
           ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Samsung model: HM160HI size: 149.05 GiB block size: 
           physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 1.5 Gb/s serial: <filter> rev: 0-15 scheme: MBR 
           ID-2: /dev/sdb type: USB vendor: Kingston model: DT 101 G2 size: 1.87 GiB block size: 
           physical: 512 B logical: 512 B serial: <filter> rev: 1.00 scheme: MBR 
Partition: ID-1: / raw size: N/A size: 2.96 GiB used: 72.9 MiB (2.4%) fs: overlay 
           source: ERR-102 
           ID-2: swap-1 size: 1.96 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) fs: swap swappiness: 15 (default 60) 
           cache pressure: 100 (default) dev: /dev/sda2 
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 56.0 C mobo: N/A 
           Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A 
Repos:     No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list 
           Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list 
           1: deb http://iso.mxrepo.com/antix/buster buster main
           Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list 
           1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates main contrib non-free
           Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list 
           1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian buster main contrib non-free
           2: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main contrib non-free
           Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mx.list 
           1: deb http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ buster main non-free
           No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/various.list 
Info:      Processes: 212 Uptime: 24m Memory: 3.76 GiB used: 1.05 GiB (28.0%) Init: SysVinit 
           v: 2.93 runlevel: 5 default: 5 Compilers: gcc: 8.3.0 alt: 8 Shell: bash v: 5.0.3 
           running in: quick-system-in inxi: 3.0.36 
Video Tweaks:
pre-sandybridge UXA acceleration
[/code]

EDIT> Well, i went to mx tweak and resored default panel and now it is good. May be a little too much transparency in the background with greybird-mx (but that may be on purpose). (second image)
And the icons on window buttons are too small. (but that's an xfce thing isn't it?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Laurentius on Thu Oct 17, 2019 6:59 pm, edited 5 times in total.

User avatar
Srdjan
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:39 pm

Re: MX-19 RC1 Feedback thread

#95 Post by Srdjan »

Why there is no option for shutdown on Laptop lid closed (in power manager settings)?

Can that be added somehow?

Also, I have set power button to shut down, and nothing happens if I press power button on laptop.
Screenshot-3.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Srdjan on Thu Oct 17, 2019 6:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
BitJam
Developer
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:36 pm

Re: MX-19 RC1 Feedback thread

#96 Post by BitJam »

BV206 wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:41 am Now at least it can find the correct boot partition on the USB but then I get:
Fatal error
Encrypted device /dev/sdb2 is not a LUKS device.

I had encrypt checked in LUM so it looks like it made an encrypted partition but it can't use it for some reason.
Unfortunately, I have not yet been able to replicate this problem here although others have.

If your live-usb is at /dev/sdd then what is the output of:

Code: Select all

sudo lsblk -o name,fstype,label /dev/sdd
Here the output looks like:

Code: Select all

 NAME   FSTYPE      LABEL
sdd                
├─sdd1 ext4        MX-Live-usb
├─sdd2 crypto_LUKS 
└─sdd3 vfat        MX-UEFI
I think I can fix the problem once I'm able to replicate it.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool."

-- Richard Feynman

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7774
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: MX-19 RC1 Feedback thread

#97 Post by asqwerth »

dreamer wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:21 pm...

That's good and time-saving info. Is it possible to preserve /home in the installer if /home is located on the root partition?
It should from past experience. I haven't had time to install MX19 rc yet.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10854
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: MX-19 RC1 Feedback thread

#98 Post by richb »

Yes, I just did so in RC1 install yesterday.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
anticapitalista
Developer
Posts: 4282
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: MX-19 RC1 Feedback thread

#99 Post by anticapitalista »

BitJam wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2019 6:41 pm
BV206 wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:41 am Now at least it can find the correct boot partition on the USB but then I get:
Fatal error
Encrypted device /dev/sdb2 is not a LUKS device.

I had encrypt checked in LUM so it looks like it made an encrypted partition but it can't use it for some reason.
Unfortunately, I have not yet been able to replicate this problem here although others have.

If your live-usb is at /dev/sdd then what is the output of:

Code: Select all

sudo lsblk -o name,fstype,label /dev/sdd
Here the output looks like:

Code: Select all

 NAME   FSTYPE      LABEL
sdd                
├─sdd1 ext4        MX-Live-usb
├─sdd2 crypto_LUKS 
└─sdd3 vfat        MX-UEFI
I think I can fix the problem once I'm able to replicate it.
Just to jump in as I get the same error.

Code: Select all

sudo lsblk -o name,fstype,label /dev/sdb
[sudo] password for anticap: 
NAME   FSTYPE      LABEL
sdb                
├─sdb1 ext4        antiX-Live-usb
├─sdb2 crypto_LUKS 
└─sdb3 vfat        ANTIX-UEFI
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
BV206
Posts: 475
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 10:55 am

Re: MX-19 RC1 Feedback thread

#100 Post by BV206 »

I had to make another USB. I still get Fatal error Encrypted device /dev/sdb2 is not a LUKS device.
Here is the lsblk output.

Code: Select all

$ sudo lsblk -o name,fstype,label /dev/sdc
NAME   FSTYPE      LABEL
sdc                
├─sdc1 ext4        MX-Live-usb
├─sdc2 crypto_LUKS 
└─sdc3 vfat        MX-UEFI
I don't know if it makes any difference but this laptop is about 2010-2011 vintage and has the old style BIOS.

Locked

Return to “General”