
MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback
Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback
I don't know what it's called on Linux but it's Task Bar on Windows. On previous versions of MX, it's large enough so the icons are also larger and easy to work with. But with MX 19 I think it's become too slim so it's very difficult to work with the icons since they're too small now. I want the old Task Bar back 

- Eadwine Rose
- Administrator
- Posts: 14471
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:10 am
Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback
Right click, properties, increase the size.
MX-23.6_x64 July 31 2023 * 6.1.0-34amd64 ext4 Xfce 4.20.0 * 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.216.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.216.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030
Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback
I know this. But I think it should be large by default like on previous versions of MX.
Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback
On MX Package Installer, could you add Zulu JDK? They provide ready to use .deb packages: https://www.azul.com/downloads/zulu-com ... x86-64-bit
I asked about it because Azul Zulu does patched their java for better font rendering, it helps Swing based applications like Netbeans very much
p/s: I know I shouldn't post it here but I don't know where to post it at all, sorry
I asked about it because Azul Zulu does patched their java for better font rendering, it helps Swing based applications like Netbeans very much

p/s: I know I shouldn't post it here but I don't know where to post it at all, sorry

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback
First thing after I install OS is resizing that thing to 28 pixels :DI know this. But I think it should be large by default like on previous versions of MX.
- entropyfoe
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:42 am
Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback
I thought my beta3, on an fscked partition was solid, but it crashed after 1 day and 14 hours, at idle. Of the 6 or so all freezes have been at idle, when I am not present, only one was when I was doing something (opening the MXPI).
This one was at almost idle. I had firefox with 6 tabs, minimized on the panel and clementine, also not playing minimized. I had the terminal open to top, so I see, frozen (no response to mouse of KB) what was running.
The items of interest are kworker and rcu_sched. See attached.
I don't know what kworker does, there is some kind of event.
And the rcu is of interest, because way back when Ryzen came out, I needed some boot parameter RCU_NO_CBS or something. This has not been necessary since a BISO fix prevented the machine from going to such low power it locked up. Is it related that my freezes are now with low work loads?
Any ideas? This is a fresh install from a day and a half ago, nvidia not yet installed, not many other programs yet. I was thinking the power supply after I had a power failure (I do have a surge protector), but why at low work loads? At seeming random?
MEMTEST?
What next?
This one was at almost idle. I had firefox with 6 tabs, minimized on the panel and clementine, also not playing minimized. I had the terminal open to top, so I see, frozen (no response to mouse of KB) what was running.
The items of interest are kworker and rcu_sched. See attached.
I don't know what kworker does, there is some kind of event.
And the rcu is of interest, because way back when Ryzen came out, I needed some boot parameter RCU_NO_CBS or something. This has not been necessary since a BISO fix prevented the machine from going to such low power it locked up. Is it related that my freezes are now with low work loads?
Any ideas? This is a fresh install from a day and a half ago, nvidia not yet installed, not many other programs yet. I was thinking the power supply after I had a power failure (I do have a surge protector), but why at low work loads? At seeming random?
MEMTEST?
What next?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
MX 23.5 on Asus PRIME X470-PRO
AMD Ryzen 3600X (12 threads @ 3.8 GHz)
32 Gig DDR4 3600 (Crucial CL 16)
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Samsung 970 NVMe nvme0n1 P1-3=MX-23.5, P4=testing
Samsung 980 NVMe =1TB Data, plus 2TB WD =backups
on-board ethernet & sound
AMD Ryzen 3600X (12 threads @ 3.8 GHz)
32 Gig DDR4 3600 (Crucial CL 16)
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Samsung 970 NVMe nvme0n1 P1-3=MX-23.5, P4=testing
Samsung 980 NVMe =1TB Data, plus 2TB WD =backups
on-board ethernet & sound
Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback
I thought I'd install the 32-bit version on the Acer Skylake Optimus laptop to see how the 390 Nvidia legacy driver install went on it, though I think almost all users will be installing 64-bit on these type of laptops. One thing I noticed right away is that I could only install in the spinning HD's MBR and boot in legacy mode, probably because it was 32-bit instead of 64 bit.
The MX Nvidia installer performed well and installed the 390xx legacy driver automatically, since that's the latest version that supports 32-bit, but the Bumblebee GPU switching didn't work, even after several reboots. I then booted with the systemd option, and Bumblebee started working, and continued working, even after I rebooted without systemd. IDK if it was coincidence or systemd that made it start to work, but not many users will be installing 32-bit on this type of machine anyway, so I'm going to test it with 64-bit next.
The MX Nvidia installer performed well and installed the 390xx legacy driver automatically, since that's the latest version that supports 32-bit, but the Bumblebee GPU switching didn't work, even after several reboots. I then booted with the systemd option, and Bumblebee started working, and continued working, even after I rebooted without systemd. IDK if it was coincidence or systemd that made it start to work, but not many users will be installing 32-bit on this type of machine anyway, so I'm going to test it with 64-bit next.
Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback
HOWTO: Burn bootable USBs from Tips&Tricks covers this.hunghung wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 1:14 pm What would you do when you're on other Unix-like system and don't have MX Live USB Maker?
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.
Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback
That's a matter of personal taste. Others think it's fine the way it is, still others think it should be smaller, some think it should be at the bottom or top... whatever is chosen as the default, it isn't going to please everyone. That's why it's adjustable.hunghung wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 1:43 pmI know this. But I think it should be large by default like on previous versions of MX.
Plus, not everyone has a big high-def monitor. If the default panel is large it will be way too big on an old low-res netbook with an 11" screen.
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.
Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback
Quick System Info? No one can help you without any information about your computer.
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.