MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

Message
Author
User avatar
JayM
Posts: 6796
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:47 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#231 Post by JayM »

BitJam wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2019 12:12 am
JayM wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:56 pm Suggestion: try creating a new partition table on the USB stick, either gpt or msdos, which should wipe everything from it, then run LUM again and see if it creates a gpt table this time. I've had instanced where, if I reused a USB stick that had one of the MX-19 betas burned to it and I tried to burn an MX-18 ISO to it, or vice-versa, it wouldn't work unless I completely wiped the USB in gparted first.
This won't help. Live-usb-maker actually wipes the partition table better than gparted does. If you are having trouble with a device behaving properly in gparted then you can try the clear-partition feature of live-usb-maker.

Also, since we wipe out the partition table and start afresh, it doesn't matter what partitioning is originally on the device.

I just used the command line tool live-usb-maker using the --gpt flag and it uses gpt partitioning so I think this is just a minor bug in the gui wrapper.

Thanks for catching it bpr323!
I actually noticed it back in 19b1, when I tried to reuse its USB stick within MX-18 to burn an 18 iso and LUM failed with an error unless I wiped the stick in gparted first by creating a new msdos partition table, but it didn't even occur to me to report it, I don't know why not. I just assumed that 19 did something differently when it burned live USBs and let it go at that. This was using strictly msdos partitioning, both for 18 and 19. So whatever's wrong also needs to be fixed in MX-18's LUM's gui.
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.

User avatar
bpr323
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2019 10:17 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#232 Post by bpr323 »

BitJam wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2019 12:12 am
JayM wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:56 pm Suggestion: try creating a new partition table on the USB stick, either gpt or msdos, which should wipe everything from it, then run LUM again and see if it creates a gpt table this time. I've had instanced where, if I reused a USB stick that had one of the MX-19 betas burned to it and I tried to burn an MX-18 ISO to it, or vice-versa, it wouldn't work unless I completely wiped the USB in gparted first.
This won't help. Live-usb-maker actually wipes the partition table better than gparted does. If you are having trouble with a device behaving properly in gparted then you can try the clear-partition feature of live-usb-maker.

Also, since we wipe out the partition table and start afresh, it doesn't matter what partitioning is originally on the device.

I just used the command line tool live-usb-maker using the --gpt flag and it uses gpt partitioning so I think this is just a minor bug in the gui wrapper.

Thanks for catching it bpr323!
Do you have a cloud space somewhere I can upload a bunch of s/shots of errors from my failed 19b3 install?
There's 230mib of hi-res mobile phone photos of my laptop screen (45 of them) - I can't be bothered shrinking and posting them here

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7787
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#233 Post by asqwerth »

Just upload to a picture hosting site, and provide links to all the pics here instead of shrinking and posting the pics themselves here.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
bpr323
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2019 10:17 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#234 Post by bpr323 »

Uploaded to Google photos - hope you can see them there -
https://photos.app.goo.gl/DirQd11Fs5J54ESq6

User avatar
BitJam
Developer
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:36 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#235 Post by BitJam »

JayM wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2019 12:31 amI actually noticed it back in 19b1, when I tried to reuse its USB stick within MX-18 to burn an 18 iso and LUM failed with an error unless I wiped the stick in gparted first by creating a new msdos partition table, but it didn't even occur to me to report it, I don't know why not.
If this happens again, I'd like to see the failed session in /var/log/live-usb-maker.log.

Also, if you have a recipe for creating sticks that will fail, that would be grand but I realize this is a long shot and may not be possible.

My wild guess is that maybe we got tripped up by auto-mounting. The log file should tell us more. I've written LUM live-usbs on top of previous LUM live-usbs literally hundreds of times without a problem like this. But I don't have auto-mounting enabled. If automounting is the problem, I do have an adjust I can make. We may also be able to use the anti-automounting technique that fehlix developed for the installer.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool."

-- Richard Feynman

User avatar
JayM
Posts: 6796
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:47 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#236 Post by JayM »

BitJam wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:08 am
JayM wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2019 12:31 amI actually noticed it back in 19b1, when I tried to reuse its USB stick within MX-18 to burn an 18 iso and LUM failed with an error unless I wiped the stick in gparted first by creating a new msdos partition table, but it didn't even occur to me to report it, I don't know why not.
If this happens again, I'd like to see the failed session in /var/log/live-usb-maker.log.

Also, if you have a recipe for creating sticks that will fail, that would be grand but I realize this is a long shot and may not be possible.

My wild guess is that maybe we got tripped up by auto-mounting. The log file should tell us more. I've written LUM live-usbs on top of previous LUM live-usbs literally hundreds of times without a problem like this. But I don't have auto-mounting enabled. If automounting is the problem, I do have an adjust I can make. We may also be able to use the anti-automounting technique that fehlix developed for the installer.
OK, I'll see if I can replicate the problem later and if so I'll post my log file.
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.

User avatar
JayM
Posts: 6796
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:47 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#237 Post by JayM »

@BitJam: I'm unable to replicate the problem now.

Things that are different include my computer (I was using my AMD desktop before but its motherboard failed. I'm currently on an HP laptop), the MX-19 beta version (I encountered the issue with betas 1 and 2) and possibly the version of LUM if it was upgraded in the past two or three months, though I don't see it in my upgrade history (which only starts on 23 September.)

If I encounter the issue again I'll start a new topic for it if it's happening in MX-18, or else post a new reply here if it's in 19b3. There's no point on seeing if I can make LUM fail with 19b1 or 2.1 involved as we've already moved to b3 anyway.
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.

User avatar
BitJam
Developer
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:36 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#238 Post by BitJam »

JayM wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2019 4:36 am[...] the MX-19 beta version (I encountered the issue with betas 1 and 2) and possibly the version of LUM if it was upgraded in the past two or three months, though I don't see it in my upgrade history (which only starts on 23 September.)
Thanks for the report JayM! The part of the code that clears the partition table(s) has been stable for a long time. Probably years. I'd be very surprised if it fails. It is possible we are getting tripped up by auto-mounting.
If I encounter the issue again I'll start a new topic for it if it's happening in MX-18, or else post a new reply here if it's in 19b3. There's no point on seeing if I can make LUM fail with 19b1 or 2.1 involved as we've already moved to b3 anyway.
Whatever works for you. I will PM you my email address which is the best way for you to get in touch with me.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool."

-- Richard Feynman

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22083
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#239 Post by dolphin_oracle »

We will take a look at the lum-gui options and see what's going on with gpt switch not being respected.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
bpr323
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2019 10:17 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#240 Post by bpr323 »

dolphin_oracle wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2019 6:48 am We will take a look at the lum-gui options and see what's going on with gpt switch not being respected.
Just curious - did you have a chance to have a look at my screenshots?
https://photos.app.goo.gl/DirQd11Fs5J54ESq6
Plenty of bug-porn there :)
For starters, minstall-gui just crashes when it can't complete at any step.
I will rephrase - errors are displayed to User, but if s/he persists and selects continue - minstall-gui just spins its wheels. Should just gracefully exit imho.
You have 2 issues that need to be decoupled:
1) lum-gui works, but produces problematic output in ISO
2) ministall-gui either cannot digest the ISO properly -
a) there might be issues with ISO data but minstall-gui just can't handle the exceptions properly, or
b) the ISO data is "mostly" correct, but minstall-gui can't convert it into succesful install
c) or permutations of all of the above, which makes it incredibly difficult to isolate the cascading bugs
Last edited by bpr323 on Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:30 am, edited 3 times in total.

Locked

Return to “General”