MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

Message
Author
User avatar
Lupin
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2019 4:52 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#541 Post by Lupin »

is it possible to add the Alsamixer-plus equalizer(antiX feature) in the upcoming release?
sorry if im not on the right topic to ask this, is it possible to enable that feature in my current 18.3?

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10920
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#542 Post by richb »

Coincidence?
The recent kernel upgrade, linux-image-4.19.0-6-amd64, reduced CPU temps by a factor of 4.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

grelos
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 3:12 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#543 Post by grelos »

Pinta is missing from MX19 repo while still present on MX18. What is going to happen after beta? I ask because I find Pinta an good tool for quick photo edits (GIMP is overkill for me..).
MX-19 on Lenovo 520-15IKB

linuxcolonel

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#544 Post by linuxcolonel »

Assuming I have MX 19 Beta running well now, is it reasonable to assume I won’t have to re-install once the RTM release is available?

User avatar
chrispop99
Global Moderator
Posts: 3364
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:07 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#545 Post by chrispop99 »

linuxcolonel wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:21 pm Assuming I have MX 19 Beta running well now, is it reasonable to assume I won’t have to re-install once the RTM release is available?
You will have to install the Final version. There will not be an upgrade path from the Betas.

Chris
MX Facebook Group Administrator.
Home-built desktop - Core i5 9400, 970 EVO Plus, 8GB
DELL XPS 15
Lots of test machines

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 23246
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#546 Post by Jerry3904 »

I am starting to wonder if that remains technically true at this point when the new Debian and Xfce have been well integrated. I intend to not reinstall on a laptop, and expect it will work fine but not be identical to Final.
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

SwampRabbit
Posts: 3602
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:02 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#547 Post by SwampRabbit »

grelos wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:49 am Pinta is missing from MX19 repo while still present on MX18. What is going to happen after beta? I ask because I find Pinta an good tool for quick photo edits (GIMP is overkill for me..).
grelos I'll work on getting Pinta into the MX-19 repos
NEW USERS START HERE FAQS, MX Manual, and How to Break Your System - Don't use Ubuntu PPAs! Always post your Quick System Info (QSI) when asking for help.

User avatar
chrispop99
Global Moderator
Posts: 3364
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:07 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#548 Post by chrispop99 »

Jerry3904 wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:52 pm I am starting to wonder if that remains technically true at this point when the new Debian and Xfce have been well integrated. I intend to not reinstall on a laptop, and expect it will work fine but not be identical to Final.
The problem with that approach for users is if they run into problems, and then fail to mention that when asking for help.

Chris
MX Facebook Group Administrator.
Home-built desktop - Core i5 9400, 970 EVO Plus, 8GB
DELL XPS 15
Lots of test machines

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10920
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#549 Post by richb »

Jerry3904 wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:52 pm I am starting to wonder if that remains technically true at this point when the new Debian and Xfce have been well integrated. I intend to not reinstall on a laptop, and expect it will work fine but not be identical to Final.
I am considering the same approach on my desktop.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
dreamer
Posts: 924
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:34 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#550 Post by dreamer »

richb wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:45 pm
Jerry3904 wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:52 pm I am starting to wonder if that remains technically true at this point when the new Debian and Xfce have been well integrated. I intend to not reinstall on a laptop, and expect it will work fine but not be identical to Final.
I am considering the same approach on my desktop.
The big visual glitch in beta 2.1 is shutdown/restart that takes you to LightDM for a moment. If this is fixed in final it's a big improvement. If it's not, then running a beta a little longer might not hurt. In any case, when someone posts "Quick System Info" it will probably show if it's a beta install or not. If there is a problem the first suggestion might be: Install final and then come back if problem persists.
Note to self and others: SysVinit is a good option. However if you run into problems try with systemd first. This applies to AppImages, Flatpaks, GitHub packages and even some Debian packages.

Locked

Return to “General”