MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
Cool, glad that helped.
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
- chrispop99
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 3333
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:07 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
It makes no difference whether you log the 2nd user in with the 1st user still logged in, or reboot and only log the 2nd user in.
The second user has 2 pulse audio entries, although one is unchecked:dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:55 am Could you look in session and startup for the second user. I have been messing with the desktop.defaults and it's possible.you've found a problem if the new settings have been applied.to your new user.
Specifically look.for pulseaudiostart and volumeicon
Here is the relevant part for the first user created:
Chris
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
MX Facebook Group Administrator.
Home-built desktop - Core i5 9400, 970 EVO Plus, 8GB
DELL XPS 15
Lots of test machines
Home-built desktop - Core i5 9400, 970 EVO Plus, 8GB
DELL XPS 15
Lots of test machines
- dolphin_oracle
- Developer
- Posts: 22089
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
that's what I thought. the new user has the new defaults, but the original user doesn't, because they updated after beta 2.1 released.chrispop99 wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 8:56 amIt makes no difference whether you log the 2nd user in with the 1st user still logged in, or reboot and only log the 2nd user in.
The second user has 2 pulse audio entries, although one is unchecked:dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:55 am Could you look in session and startup for the second user. I have been messing with the desktop.defaults and it's possible.you've found a problem if the new settings have been applied.to your new user.
Specifically look.for pulseaudiostart and volumeicon
user2.png
Here is the relevant part for the first user created:
user1.png
Chris
when you copied over the existing config, you overwrote the volumeicon.desktop entry in ~/.config/autostart. the new version prevents volumeicon from starting, in lieu of starting it from the "pulseaudiostart" entry.
so you are starting it twice. just uncheck the "volumeicon" entry, logout, login.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
- chrispop99
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 3333
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:07 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
I just opened this to post I had tried what you have suggested!dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 8:59 amthat's what I thought. the new user has the new defaults, but the original user doesn't, because they updated after beta 2.1 released.chrispop99 wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 8:56 amIt makes no difference whether you log the 2nd user in with the 1st user still logged in, or reboot and only log the 2nd user in.
The second user has 2 pulse audio entries, although one is unchecked:dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:55 am Could you look in session and startup for the second user. I have been messing with the desktop.defaults and it's possible.you've found a problem if the new settings have been applied.to your new user.
Specifically look.for pulseaudiostart and volumeicon
user2.png
Here is the relevant part for the first user created:
user1.png
Chris
when you copied over the existing config, you overwrote the volumeicon.desktop entry in ~/.config/autostart. the new version prevents volumeicon from starting, in lieu of starting it from the "pulseaudiostart" entry.
so you are starting it twice. just uncheck the "volumeicon" entry, logout, login.
If I uncheck the 2nd user's pulseaudio entry, so there are two entries unchecked, it all works fine even after a reboot, and whomever is logged in first.
Presumably there will be a way to fix it so that won't be needed?
Chris
MX Facebook Group Administrator.
Home-built desktop - Core i5 9400, 970 EVO Plus, 8GB
DELL XPS 15
Lots of test machines
Home-built desktop - Core i5 9400, 970 EVO Plus, 8GB
DELL XPS 15
Lots of test machines
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
The closest to the mentioned requirement I can get with something like to "ignore" those which are going to be added or re-partitioned. E.g. for new or recreaterd sda4, sdas5 sda6 creating such ruledolphin_oracle wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:00 pmwhat do you think of something like this, if it even still works. got it out of the depths of stackoverflow.fehlix wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:42 pmis this meant during the "run" of minstall or after.dolphin_oracle wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:39 pm fehlix, the real question is...can be block just automounting without actually blocking devices?
supposedly that disables automounting. it certainly leaves the list in place in thunar.Code: Select all
echo 'SUBSYSTEM=="block", ENV{UDISKS_AUTO}="0"' > /run/udev/rules.d/90-udisks-inhibit.rules
i tried with gparted in my test suite with some success, but I need more data points.
**never mind, didn't work in practice **
Code: Select all
echo 'KERNEL=="sda[456]", SUBSYSTEM=="block", ENV{UDISKS_IGNORE}="1", ENV{UDISKS_AUTO}="0"' > /run/udev/rules.d/00-udisk2-ignore-block.rules
udevadm control --reload; udevadm trigger --subsystem-match=block
- dolphin_oracle
- Developer
- Posts: 22089
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
joys of beta. it will be fine on RC without any intervention. basically if you hadn't have copied over the stuff from your first user the second user would have been fine.chrispop99 wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:08 amI just opened this to post I had tried what you have suggested!dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 8:59 amthat's what I thought. the new user has the new defaults, but the original user doesn't, because they updated after beta 2.1 released.chrispop99 wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 8:56 am
It makes no difference whether you log the 2nd user in with the 1st user still logged in, or reboot and only log the 2nd user in.
The second user has 2 pulse audio entries, although one is unchecked:
user2.png
Here is the relevant part for the first user created:
user1.png
Chris
when you copied over the existing config, you overwrote the volumeicon.desktop entry in ~/.config/autostart. the new version prevents volumeicon from starting, in lieu of starting it from the "pulseaudiostart" entry.
so you are starting it twice. just uncheck the "volumeicon" entry, logout, login.
If I uncheck the 2nd user's pulseaudio entry, so there are two entries unchecked, it all works fine even after a reboot, and whomever is logged in first.
Presumably there will be a way to fix it so that won't be needed?
Chris
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
- chrispop99
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 3333
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:07 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
I'm only trying things to see if they break!dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:47 am
joys of beta. it will be fine on RC without any intervention. basically if you hadn't have copied over the stuff from your first user the second user would have been fine.
Chris
MX Facebook Group Administrator.
Home-built desktop - Core i5 9400, 970 EVO Plus, 8GB
DELL XPS 15
Lots of test machines
Home-built desktop - Core i5 9400, 970 EVO Plus, 8GB
DELL XPS 15
Lots of test machines
- dolphin_oracle
- Developer
- Posts: 22089
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
and I apprecite it very much !!!!!!!!!!chrispop99 wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:53 amI'm only trying things to see if they break!dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:47 am
joys of beta. it will be fine on RC without any intervention. basically if you hadn't have copied over the stuff from your first user the second user would have been fine.
Chris
that particular one won't break on release, rest assured!
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
- dolphin_oracle
- Developer
- Posts: 22089
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
fehlix wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:42 amThe closest to the mentioned requirement I can get with something like to "ignore" those which are going to be added or re-partitioned. E.g. for new or recreaterd sda4, sdas5 sda6 creating such ruledolphin_oracle wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:00 pmwhat do you think of something like this, if it even still works. got it out of the depths of stackoverflow.
supposedly that disables automounting. it certainly leaves the list in place in thunar.Code: Select all
echo 'SUBSYSTEM=="block", ENV{UDISKS_AUTO}="0"' > /run/udev/rules.d/90-udisks-inhibit.rules
i tried with gparted in my test suite with some success, but I need more data points.
**never mind, didn't work in practice **
seems to not trigger any automount. Perhaps also related to udev polling time. After removing later that rule devies are shown but automount is not triggered.Code: Select all
echo 'KERNEL=="sda[456]", SUBSYSTEM=="block", ENV{UDISKS_IGNORE}="1", ENV{UDISKS_AUTO}="0"' > /run/udev/rules.d/00-udisk2-ignore-block.rules udevadm control --reload; udevadm trigger --subsystem-match=block
that's close. but the ones that I get asked to automount aren't the ones we are installing to anyway (there are already mounted), its other partitions and especially partitions on other devices.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
- dolphin_oracle
- Developer
- Posts: 22089
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
**never mind, I don't like what I wrote so I removed it**
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.