MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

Message
Author
User avatar
Paul..
Posts: 1782
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:34 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#81 Post by Paul.. »

fehlix wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 10:49 am
Paul.. wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:37 am small thing...volumeicon is grey vs. other icons white...
audioicon.png EDIT: Installation is on hardware, not Live USB...
grey := mute
viewtopic.php?p=526169#p526169

Asus Prime X570-Pro | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
16 Gig DDR4 3600 | Radeon RX 5600 XT Graphics
Samsung 860 500GB SSDs (2)

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10856
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#82 Post by richb »

fehlix wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:10 pm
richb wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:03 pm
fehlix wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:37 pm
Yes, issue known - Seattle :mad: made.
Do not understand the Seattle reference.
using locatime instead of UTC and resisting to change to UTC was somehow grown up in a suburb of that mentioned place. :bawling:
Interesting. Uninformed question then. Why when I checked Local Time during the install process the resulting install did not exhibit the problem?
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7787
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#83 Post by asqwerth »

Is there any possibility that the new MX time & date app is interacting weirdly with the rest of the distro, thereby causing these issues in beta 2.1?

Just a completely non techie, off the shelf, thought .
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
AK-47
Developer
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2019 7:04 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#84 Post by AK-47 »

MX Date & Time only runs when you run it, and will only change system settings when buttons are pushed. There are some known issues that are being worked on and should be fixed in an update soon.

User avatar
jorgosek
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:05 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#85 Post by jorgosek »

USB Live.LibreOffice not start,just flash for a moment.

rej
Posts: 160
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 10:11 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#86 Post by rej »

Hi-

Looks very nice!

Don't know if this is intentional:

When the panels (transparent or not) are in "hidden" mode, they leave a white line on the screen where they are hidden.

and

Grub Customizer has to be installed manually.

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7787
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#87 Post by asqwerth »

rej wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:06 am Hi-

Looks very nice!

Don't know if this is intentional:

When the panels (transparent or not) are in "hidden" mode, they leave a white line on the screen where they are hidden.

and

Grub Customizer has to be installed manually.
Due to various issues caused by Grub Customiser, it will not be a default program on the MX iso. Its use is not recommended. Use MX Boot Options for the basic grub settings tweaks. If you still want to use Grub Customiser, you'll have to install it yourself.

White line issue - Pls post a screenshot here.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
blindside
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2019 2:48 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#88 Post by blindside »

I tried the first beta and it would just not work. Put 18.3 back on, but wondering if it was worth it to try the next beta iteration?
And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him.

User avatar
Adrian
Developer
Posts: 8887
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:42 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#89 Post by Adrian »

blindside wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:35 am I tried the first beta and it would just not work. Put 18.3 back on, but wondering if it was worth it to try the next beta iteration?
Only if you want to find bugs, report them, in the idea that bringing them to light might make it easier for devs to fix them. That's the purpose of betas.

User avatar
blindside
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2019 2:48 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#90 Post by blindside »

I would love to pitch in with any small way I could, and I know what a beta is. My thought on trying the newer beta is that it *just* might actually install on my machine. Like, is there anything that might have changed as far as it working with a brand new drive, and a brand new machine for the most part. It not being able to install was mind-boggling in the least.

Adrian wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:40 am
blindside wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:35 am I tried the first beta and it would just not work. Put 18.3 back on, but wondering if it was worth it to try the next beta iteration?
Only if you want to find bugs, report them, in the idea that bringing them to light might make it easier for devs to fix them. That's the purpose of betas.
And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him.

Locked

Return to “General”