MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

Message
Author
User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22095
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: (cannot install to sda20)

#71 Post by dolphin_oracle »

baldyeti wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 5:30 pm I tried on another similarly partitioned system with the same outcome - partitions after 15 flagged as isBoot=true, not showing up
try this installer please:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=17fyNn ... YwX_zBfiWa
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22095
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#72 Post by dolphin_oracle »

superduperuser wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 7:14 pm This beta is behaving weird. After I set up live persistence: Laggy responses. $ sudo apt remove libreoffice-base libreoffice-base-core freezes. Had to control+C out and apt autoremove freezes. Firefox freezes.

Ive never ever had these problems with MX. Even 19.1 Beta was great. :/ Super frustrating
if you could send the system info (quick-system-info in the menu) while you are running with persistence that might be of some use. the kernel is new...
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 23097
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#73 Post by Jerry3904 »

Welcome to the Forum! It sounds like you might have a bad download. Can you click Start and start typing to launch Quick System Info and paste it back here so we can take a look at your system?
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 12626
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#74 Post by fehlix »

richb wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 6:59 pm
fehlix wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 6:06 pm
richb wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 5:28 pm Running Live I receive this same error as on the preview. Waiting makes no difference nor does changing repos.
viewtopic.php?f=86&t=52564&p=525951&hil ... ta#p525951
I then installed and that error does not occur.

Also running Live the mouse cursor theme will apparently not change not change in size. However after the install when saving Home changes that were made, the change made in Live for the mouse is implemented.
Seem to me somehow systematic issue, kind of timezone in combinations with localtime or wrong hardware clock issue.
As apt always appear to think your "clock" is a bit to late (or to early resp.) :alien:
Hmm.. what about checking clock, UTC, and RTC (= hardwareclock) before a next live update, e.g. with persistence.
Not an issue I am trying to fix. Just reported it in case it is a common problem others may experience. No one else has reported it. I can try your suggestion tomorrow if it will be helpful
When you boot the LiveUSB on a system which run the clock in localtime (e.g. having booted before in WinOS),
and the LiveSystem boots in UTC the system assumes (wrongly) the RTC-clock is set to UTC.
E.g. your timezone is set to UTC-4: Now when apt/dpkg fetches an InRelease file, which is not older then 4 hours
it appears to "apt" that this InRelase file comes from the future and hence rejects to process this file. ( "not yet" )
Or with other words, the system appears to be 4 hours in the past.
You would have now to wait exactly as long so that the InRelease file becomes older until it is not anymore from the future.
To sort this you can either set the RTC-clock to correct UTC-time or set LOCAL for using the locale RTC-time
by using "MX Date & Time". Alternatively you could also boot live with boot option hwclock=local .
HTH
:puppy:

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10856
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#75 Post by richb »

@fehlix Understand. So it is a known issue, not requiring further investigation.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

rskempf

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#76 Post by rskempf »

I just loaded this release on an i5, 64 bit system. The pc is working well - no problems at all. Nice work!

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 23097
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#77 Post by Jerry3904 »

Thanks for checking in -- welcome to the Forum!
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 12626
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#78 Post by fehlix »

richb wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:17 pm @fehlix Understand. So it is a known issue, not requiring further investigation.
Yes, issue known - Seattle :mad: made.

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10856
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#79 Post by richb »

fehlix wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:37 pm
richb wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:17 pm @fehlix Understand. So it is a known issue, not requiring further investigation.
Yes, issue known - Seattle :mad: made.
Do not understand the Seattle reference.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 12626
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#80 Post by fehlix »

richb wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:03 pm
fehlix wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:37 pm
richb wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:17 pm @fehlix Understand. So it is a known issue, not requiring further investigation.
Yes, issue known - Seattle :mad: made.
Do not understand the Seattle reference.
using locatime instead of UTC and resisting to change to UTC was somehow grown up in a suburb of that mentioned place. :bawling:

Locked

Return to “General”