MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

Message
Author
User avatar
jj1j1
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue May 28, 2019 3:49 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#371 Post by jj1j1 »

Did you log out and in again?
No. That was without logging out.
True freedom is never asking the question; Am I free?

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10856
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#372 Post by richb »

Eadwine Rose wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:15 pm I'll try this out sometime tomorrow. Thanks Rich!

And thank you too Ghost67


That is quite different from the "old" way.
It is and not obvious at all.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
Ghost67
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 5:04 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#373 Post by Ghost67 »

richb wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 5:24 pm
Eadwine Rose wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:15 pm I'll try this out sometime tomorrow. Thanks Rich!

And thank you too Ghost67


That is quite different from the "old" way.
It is and not obvious at all.
I'm curious as to whether there is still any way ('under the hood' so to speak) to add transparency to a panel that uses the system style for its colouring?
It has to still be there somewhere, right?

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10856
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#374 Post by richb »

Ghost67 wrote:I'm curious as to whether there is still any way ('under the hood' so to speak) to add transparency to a panel that uses the system style for its colouring?
It has to still be there somewhere, right?
I am not sure it has to be there. The result would be the same. Would it not?
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
Ghost67
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 5:04 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#375 Post by Ghost67 »

richb wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 5:56 pm
Ghost67 wrote:I'm curious as to whether there is still any way ('under the hood' so to speak) to add transparency to a panel that uses the system style for its colouring?
It has to still be there somewhere, right?
I am not sure it has to be there. The result would be the same. Would it not?
I guess so. Using the eyedropper tool and transparency slider.

(I've edited here): Originally I suggested that 4.12 could add transparency to the panel if an image was used for the background, but testing on MX-18 says I was wrong :)
So I guess we pretty much have the same functionality in 4.14 that we had in 4.12 - just a different GUI.

Cheers Richb.

User avatar
dreamer
Posts: 889
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:34 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#376 Post by dreamer »

Ghost67 wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 5:44 pm
richb wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 5:24 pm
Eadwine Rose wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:15 pm I'll try this out sometime tomorrow. Thanks Rich!

And thank you too Ghost67


That is quite different from the "old" way.
It is and not obvious at all.
I'm curious as to whether there is still any way ('under the hood' so to speak) to add transparency to a panel that uses the system style for its colouring?
It has to still be there somewhere, right?
I don't think so. If there was it wouldn't have been removed from Settings Manager? Maybe it's possible to achieve a similar result by using Solid Color option and Alpha Slider in Color chooser. Maybe Xfce devs thought it was redundant?

You found one of the very few regressions in Xfce 4.14.
Note to self and others: SysVinit is a good option. However if you run into problems try with systemd first. This applies to AppImages, Flatpaks, GitHub packages and even some Debian packages.

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10856
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#377 Post by richb »

Not a regression. Just a different way to do it.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
dreamer
Posts: 889
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:34 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#378 Post by dreamer »

richb wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 7:26 pm Not a regression. Just a different way to do it.
Alpha slider has been removed from "system style".

System Style - Alpha present in 4.12 but NOT in 4.14
Solid Color - Alpha present in both 4.12 and 4.14
Panel background - Alpha was never an option, transparency dictated by the image file.
Note to self and others: SysVinit is a good option. However if you run into problems try with systemd first. This applies to AppImages, Flatpaks, GitHub packages and even some Debian packages.

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10856
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#379 Post by richb »

Post #367. Gives the same effect as alpha.If the end result is the same I do not see it as a regression. But whatever.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22080
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#380 Post by dolphin_oracle »

BTW since the color and transparency are specified together as a color, it's possible for gtk themes to provide a panel that has some transparency, as it does with greybird, without messing with the panel settings themselves.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

Locked

Return to “General”