MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback
- Eadwine Rose
- Administrator
- Posts: 14471
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:10 am
Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback
As you can see in the screenie.. I checked that.. they won't do it. In 18.3, yep, not in 19.
MX-23.6_x64 July 31 2023 * 6.1.0-34amd64 ext4 Xfce 4.20.0 * 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.216.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.216.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030
Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback
Great to see screen tearing is finally fixed in XFCE 4.14. MX 19 gonna be fantastic!
Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback
I had a simple and fast install. A couple of small changes, in the choice of location for Grub, option two seeming to correspond to a root location given I wanted to retain my existing Grub manager. A slight change to the password entry was the only other difference I noticed.
I was slightly confused by my dual monitor setup but quickly noticed the new layout tool in Settings, where I always go to right after rebooting, along with MX Tweak, Disk Manager, Panel/clock/Thunar preferences and options.
Nice updated icons in MX Tools. A new iDeviceMounter for those things....
Synaptic defaults worked quickly and updated fast, along with Australian spelling and thesaurus packages I typically add.
Looking forward to exploring more.
I was slightly confused by my dual monitor setup but quickly noticed the new layout tool in Settings, where I always go to right after rebooting, along with MX Tweak, Disk Manager, Panel/clock/Thunar preferences and options.
Nice updated icons in MX Tools. A new iDeviceMounter for those things....
Synaptic defaults worked quickly and updated fast, along with Australian spelling and thesaurus packages I typically add.
Looking forward to exploring more.

Inspiron 15 5000-5593- (i7-1065G7) MX 23..2 AHS/MX-21//W10 - Lenovo ThinkCentre A58 4GBRAM (64-bit), MX-23.2/MX21.3./antiX 23/Mint 21.3, Ubuntu 22.04.4, openSUSE Tumbleweed,
Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback
From the official page they give the instructions to place the public key and to have available the updates:zebedeeboss wrote: Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:31 amThanks - I do understand that - however you are proving the installation process via the MX Package Installer - so that method should work? Should it not ?AK-47 wrote: Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:20 am The softmaker.com repos are not official Debian or MX repos. We can't guarantee that the softmaker.com repos will work, and if something breaks, we may not be able to support them.
However it sounds like you don't have a public key for those repos installed. You need to get the public key for those repos from SoftMaker and install it using sudo apt key add <gpg-key-file> and then run sudo apt update to sync it all up.
Regards Zeb
https://www.freeoffice.com/en/tips-and-tricks-linux
No todos ignoramos las mismas cosas. 

- dolphin_oracle
- Developer
- Posts: 22083
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback
thanks...we probably need to update the the softmaker routines in mxpi (looks like atom should be working). do you still have a /var/log/mxpi.log (or /var/log/mxpi.log.old) file showing the errors?zebedeeboss wrote: Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:14 am Hi all, Installing some packages from the MX Package Insaller - I get errors for Atom and Softmaker Office
Regards Zeb...Hit:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease
Hit:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster InRelease
Hit:3 http://linux.teamviewer.com/deb stable InRelease
Hit:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates InRelease
Get:5 http://shop.softmaker.com/repo/apt wheezy InRelease [2,322 B]
Hit:6 http://iso.mxrepo.com/antix/buster buster InRelease
Hit:7 http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo buster InRelease
Err:5 http://shop.softmaker.com/repo/apt wheezy InRelease
The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 3413DA98AA3E7F5E
Hit:8 https://packagecloud.io/AtomEditor/atom/any any InRelease
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://shop.softmaker.com/repo/apt wheezy InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 3413DA98AA3E7F5E
E: The repository 'http://shop.softmaker.com/repo/apt wheezy InRelease' is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback
I can't reproduce this issue. Without seeing the full console log, it's only a guess: The only reason I can think of that you manually might have added the softmaker repo, without adding the the public signing key first. The MXPI procedure will make sure that a public key will be added.zebedeeboss wrote: Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:14 am Hi all, Installing some packages from the MX Package Insaller - I get errors for Atom and Softmaker Office
W: GPG error: http://shop.softmaker.com/repo/apt wheezy InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 3413DA98AA3E7F5E
E: The repository 'http://shop.softmaker.com/repo/apt wheezy InRelease' is not signed.

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback
I reported earlier that Mugshot demanded a password then rejected it. Well, after a reboot, it demanded it once, accepted it, and since then hasn't demanded it at all. Weird but all working correctly now.
About Eadwine's problem with Notification Area (System Tray) icons being a bit distorted, I fixed this on mine, by finding a spot on the tray that, when right-clicked, gets you access to its settings and not an individual app's settings. Bring up the Properties icon. Selecting "Square Icons" fixes the problem at the expense of moving the icons too far apart. What you can do is to increase the "Maximum Icon Size" a little. You'll find that the icons don't really get bigger but move a little further apart, fixing the problem! Maybe this default spacing can be changed for the final release.
About Eadwine's problem with Notification Area (System Tray) icons being a bit distorted, I fixed this on mine, by finding a spot on the tray that, when right-clicked, gets you access to its settings and not an individual app's settings. Bring up the Properties icon. Selecting "Square Icons" fixes the problem at the expense of moving the icons too far apart. What you can do is to increase the "Maximum Icon Size" a little. You'll find that the icons don't really get bigger but move a little further apart, fixing the problem! Maybe this default spacing can be changed for the final release.
Desktop: Mini-Box M350 with Asus H110i-plus motherboard, Pentium G4600 processor, 2TB SSD and 16Gb RAM DDR4-2133
Printer/Scanner: Brother MFC-J5335W
Laptop: Lenovo V15 ADA
Media Centre: Lenovo Q190
Printer/Scanner: Brother MFC-J5335W
Laptop: Lenovo V15 ADA
Media Centre: Lenovo Q190
- dolphin_oracle
- Developer
- Posts: 22083
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback
ugh...the softmaker people are irritating...they've changed their repo keys (probably) and hid the information inside their deb for freeoffice.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
- dolphin_oracle
- Developer
- Posts: 22083
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback
their file they reference in the instructions isn't present in the deb.Gerson wrote: Wed Aug 28, 2019 7:17 amFrom the official page they give the instructions to place the public key and to have available the updates:zebedeeboss wrote: Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:31 amThanks - I do understand that - however you are proving the installation process via the MX Package Installer - so that method should work? Should it not ?AK-47 wrote: Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:20 am The softmaker.com repos are not official Debian or MX repos. We can't guarantee that the softmaker.com repos will work, and if something breaks, we may not be able to support them.
However it sounds like you don't have a public key for those repos installed. You need to get the public key for those repos from SoftMaker and install it using sudo apt key add <gpg-key-file> and then run sudo apt update to sync it all up.
Regards Zeb
https://www.freeoffice.com/en/tips-and-tricks-linux
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
- dolphin_oracle
- Developer
- Posts: 22083
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback
the freeoffice install routine is supposed to download a signing key prior to enabling the repo and installing the package. I suspect, but I cannot confirm right now, that the key has expired or that they changed the signing key but didn't publish it. will have to investigate later.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.