MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

Message
Author
zukahn1
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 12:02 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#171 Post by zukahn1 »

Have come across one minor issue Chromium won't start after install click on icon and nothing happens running on USB everything else and the other browsers work fine on a couple of different computers.

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22080
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#172 Post by dolphin_oracle »

zukahn1 wrote: Tue Aug 27, 2019 10:12 pm Have come across one minor issue Chromium won't start after install click on icon and nothing happens running on USB everything else and the other browsers work fine on a couple of different computers.
install chromium-sandbox
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
zebedeeboss
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:33 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#173 Post by zebedeeboss »

Hi all, Installing some packages from the MX Package Insaller - I get errors for Atom and Softmaker Office
Hit:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease
Hit:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster InRelease
Hit:3 http://linux.teamviewer.com/deb stable InRelease
Hit:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates InRelease
Get:5 http://shop.softmaker.com/repo/apt wheezy InRelease [2,322 B]
Hit:6 http://iso.mxrepo.com/antix/buster buster InRelease
Hit:7 http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo buster InRelease
Err:5 http://shop.softmaker.com/repo/apt wheezy InRelease
The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 3413DA98AA3E7F5E
Hit:8 https://packagecloud.io/AtomEditor/atom/any any InRelease
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://shop.softmaker.com/repo/apt wheezy InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 3413DA98AA3E7F5E
E: The repository 'http://shop.softmaker.com/repo/apt wheezy InRelease' is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.
Regards Zeb...
Linux User #565092
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CORSAIR H100x COOLER | GIGABYTE B650M DS3H MB | 32GB Corsair DDR5 5200MHz | GeForce RTX™ 4070 | 1TB SOLIDIGM M.2 NVMe | LIAN LI LANCOOL 215 CASE | 49" G9 QLED Dual-QHD 240Hz Monitor 5120x1440 32:9 1000R Curve

User avatar
AK-47
Developer
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2019 7:04 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#174 Post by AK-47 »

The softmaker.com repos are not official Debian or MX repos. We can't guarantee that the softmaker.com repos will work, and if something breaks, we may not be able to support them.

However it sounds like you don't have a public key for those repos installed. You need to get the public key for those repos from SoftMaker and install it using sudo apt key add <gpg-key-file> and then run sudo apt update to sync it all up.

User avatar
zebedeeboss
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:33 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#175 Post by zebedeeboss »

Installing the Atom .deb file from there
solves the error from appearing during updates but I guess still needs to be resolved in the MX Package Installer

Regards Zeb...
Linux User #565092
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CORSAIR H100x COOLER | GIGABYTE B650M DS3H MB | 32GB Corsair DDR5 5200MHz | GeForce RTX™ 4070 | 1TB SOLIDIGM M.2 NVMe | LIAN LI LANCOOL 215 CASE | 49" G9 QLED Dual-QHD 240Hz Monitor 5120x1440 32:9 1000R Curve

User avatar
zebedeeboss
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:33 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#176 Post by zebedeeboss »

AK-47 wrote: Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:20 am The softmaker.com repos are not official Debian or MX repos. We can't guarantee that the softmaker.com repos will work, and if something breaks, we may not be able to support them.

However it sounds like you don't have a public key for those repos installed. You need to get the public key for those repos from SoftMaker and install it using sudo apt key add <gpg-key-file> and then run sudo apt update to sync it all up.
Thanks - I do understand that - however you are proving the installation process via the MX Package Installer - so that method should work? Should it not ?

Regards Zeb
Linux User #565092
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CORSAIR H100x COOLER | GIGABYTE B650M DS3H MB | 32GB Corsair DDR5 5200MHz | GeForce RTX™ 4070 | 1TB SOLIDIGM M.2 NVMe | LIAN LI LANCOOL 215 CASE | 49" G9 QLED Dual-QHD 240Hz Monitor 5120x1440 32:9 1000R Curve

User avatar
chrispop99
Global Moderator
Posts: 3333
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:07 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#177 Post by chrispop99 »

Eadwine Rose wrote: Tue Aug 27, 2019 9:40 am I encountered a little looks thing, moved the panel to the bottom and got this. The wired Synaptic icon behaved the same way.

Screenshot.png
Yep, this has happened through the Alphas as well, but nothing tried so far has fixed it.

Chris
MX Facebook Group Administrator.
Home-built desktop - Core i5 9400, 970 EVO Plus, 8GB
DELL XPS 15
Lots of test machines

User avatar
AK-47
Developer
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2019 7:04 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#178 Post by AK-47 »

zebedeeboss wrote: Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:31 amThanks - I do understand that - however you are proving the installation process via the MX Package Installer - so that method should work? Should it not ?

Regards Zeb
The installation process via MX Package Installer should work, and by all means if your package presents an issue with MXPI then please report it to us as well as what package you're trying to install.
However because the package comes from a foreign (non-Debian, non-MX repo), once it's installed, we can try to help to a limited extent, but we can't guarantee any results.

User avatar
zebedeeboss
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:33 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#179 Post by zebedeeboss »

AK-47 wrote: Wed Aug 28, 2019 3:01 am
zebedeeboss wrote: Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:31 amThanks - I do understand that - however you are proving the installation process via the MX Package Installer - so that method should work? Should it not ?

Regards Zeb
The installation process via MX Package Installer should work, and by all means if your package presents an issue with MXPI then please report it to us as well as what package you're trying to install.
However because the package comes from a foreign (non-Debian, non-MX repo), once it's installed, we can try to help to a limited extent, but we can't guarantee any results.
Thanks - original packages mentioned in first post. Atom and Softmaker Office - output repeated here for ease of referal

Code: Select all

Err:5 http://shop.softmaker.com/repo/apt wheezy InRelease
The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 3413DA98AA3E7F5E
Hit:8 https://packagecloud.io/AtomEditor/atom/any any InRelease
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://shop.softmaker.com/repo/apt wheezy InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 3413DA98AA3E7F5E
E: The repository 'http://shop.softmaker.com/repo/apt wheezy InRelease' is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. 
Regards Zeb...
Linux User #565092
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CORSAIR H100x COOLER | GIGABYTE B650M DS3H MB | 32GB Corsair DDR5 5200MHz | GeForce RTX™ 4070 | 1TB SOLIDIGM M.2 NVMe | LIAN LI LANCOOL 215 CASE | 49" G9 QLED Dual-QHD 240Hz Monitor 5120x1440 32:9 1000R Curve

User avatar
Dede
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2019 5:50 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 1 Feedback

#180 Post by Dede »

Problem adding font Chicago.ttf (both for the whole system and the single user): it displays little rectangles instead of letters...

Locked

Return to “General”