MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros < insert sarcasm >

For interesting topics. But remember this is a Linux Forum. Do not post offensive topics that are meant to cause trouble with other members or are derogatory towards people of different genders, race, color, minors (this includes nudity and sex), politics or religion. Let's try to keep peace among the community and for visitors.

No spam on this or any other forums please! If you post advertisements on these forums, your account may be deleted.

Do not copy and paste entire or even up to half of someone else's words or articles into posts. Post only a few sentences or a paragraph and make sure to include a link back to original words or article. Otherwise it's copyright infringement.

You can talk about other distros here, but no MX bashing. You can email the developers of MX if you just want to say you dislike or hate MX.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
masterpeace
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2019 11:35 pm

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros

#11 Post by masterpeace »

i was back from my vacation , and what did i saw when i first logged in on MX ? you done it sir , you get me , gg no re .
turtlebay777 wrote: Fri Aug 23, 2019 4:36 pm Out of interest SwampRabbit, amongst the Windows programs you have to use, is there anything that you could not do as well with Linux software, if you had the freedom to use MX at work instead?
technically as long as you have open-format-compatibility (non-free but generally more popular) , you should have no problem . i myself use MX at work .

i must say it here , the only thing bad about MX is , it spoils me rotten . so much so the linux mentor that makes me choose mx instead of mint told me to try minimal-install-devuan . the OS wonderful , the community wonderful , the ideals too are wonderful .
Top
User avatar
Artim
Posts: 349
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:04 am

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros

#12 Post by Artim »

It's a perfectly boring distro. No issues, no problems to solve, no interruptions to deal with the OS in the middle of my work. Boorrrrrinnnnng. That's exactly what I need!

All my college coursework (so far) has been done in LibreOffice, saved in Microsoft format and/or pdf file format to fully retain my special formatting, including the awesome selection of wicked-kewl fonts available in MX!
Top
User avatar
golden45
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:24 am

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros

#13 Post by golden45 »

Whats your point?
Top
User avatar
golden45
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:24 am

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros

#14 Post by golden45 »

Is my opionon they are both great
Top
SwampRabbit
Posts: 3602
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:02 pm

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros

#15 Post by SwampRabbit »

@golden45 did you not read my post?

I said they are AMAZING! not "good" ;)
NEW USERS START HERE FAQS, MX Manual, and How to Break Your System - Don't use Ubuntu PPAs! Always post your Quick System Info (QSI) when asking for help.
Top
User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7971
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros < insert sarcasm >

#16 Post by asqwerth »

Nice to see you back, SwampRabbit
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
Top
SwampRabbit
Posts: 3602
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:02 pm

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros < insert sarcasm >

#17 Post by SwampRabbit »

@asqwerth , gee thanks! I've seen everyone lingering around except for BitJam, where's he at?
I messaged him, but his profile says he hasn't been on in few days.
NEW USERS START HERE FAQS, MX Manual, and How to Break Your System - Don't use Ubuntu PPAs! Always post your Quick System Info (QSI) when asking for help.
Top
User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7971
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros < insert sarcasm >

#18 Post by asqwerth »

He's still involved in development but too busy to visit the forum much.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
Top
SwampRabbit
Posts: 3602
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:02 pm

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros < insert sarcasm >

#19 Post by SwampRabbit »

No worries at all, I figured as much especially with both antiX and MX.

Just wanted to see how the PC he built before I went on my hiatus, is still holding up for him, it would make me feel good to know something I helped him with is still being put to good use.
NEW USERS START HERE FAQS, MX Manual, and How to Break Your System - Don't use Ubuntu PPAs! Always post your Quick System Info (QSI) when asking for help.
Top
User avatar
Auro Kumar Sahoo
Posts: 357
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2018 7:54 am

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros < insert sarcasm >

#20 Post by Auro Kumar Sahoo »

MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros < because they are boring and don't break and I don't have to do anything, my time is boring and everything configured, no need to search Google for any problems and forum is so helpful >
Wallpapers for mx : https://www.flickr.com/photos/aurokumar ... 2672882131 & page2
MX help : https://mxlinux.org/manuals/

दुर्लभम् हि सदा सुखम् ||{Ramayan २-१८-१३}
To be happy always is something which is difficult to achieve.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General”