antiX live usb issue

Message
Author
rs55
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:24 pm

Re: antiX live usb issue

#91 Post by rs55 »

A suggestion:
If fuseiso* is only causing a problem for a certain subset of machines ( like mine), but necessary for other machines, then perhaps you could make fuseiso* optional, or at least allow users to uninstall it.(as it used to be prior to this latest version).

rs55
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:24 pm

Re: antiX live usb issue

#92 Post by rs55 »

anticapitalista wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:01 pm Are you sure the issue is lum etc and not your bleeding edge liquorix kernel?
I dont think its the liquorix kernel, because the problem also occurs in my Antix installation which is on 4.9 kernel.

rs55
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:24 pm

Re: antiX live usb issue

#93 Post by rs55 »

have you tested on thinkpads circa 2011-2012 models? ( x220, x230, t420, w520 etc)? These are my favorite machines and I think they are quite popular with linux enthusiasts in general.

User avatar
anticapitalista
Developer
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: antiX live usb issue

#94 Post by anticapitalista »

rs55 wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:10 pm have you tested on thinkpads circa 2011-2012 models? ( x220, x230, t420, w520 etc)? These are my favorite machines and I think they are quite popular with linux enthusiasts in general.
I have a Thinkpad L412
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22218
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: antiX live usb issue

#95 Post by dolphin_oracle »

running LUM from the command line with the "--force=nofuse" switch should then work if fuse is the problem. We can add that option to the gui easy enough.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 12693
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: antiX live usb issue

#96 Post by fehlix »

rs55 wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:05 pm If fuseiso* is only causing a problem for a certain subset of machines ( like mine), but necessary for other machines, then perhaps you could make fuseiso* optional, or at least allow users to uninstall it.(as it used to be prior to this latest version).
Please verify that it works for you with disabling fuseiso from command line like this:

Code: Select all

sudo live-usb-maker  --force=nofuse 
Probably this can also be set permanently into the saved configfile.

User avatar
BitJam
Developer
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:36 pm

Re: antiX live usb issue

#97 Post by BitJam »

rs55 wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 12:55 pm Urgent!!
In MX, I noticed the updater had updates for LUM and associated files including fuseiso and cli-..

I updated, created a new live usb and attempted to boot. Got a fatal error:
"Error: mount: mounting /dev/loop0 on /live/linux failed: Invalid argument"
This may not be a fuse problem. This error will occur when the kernel does not support the type of squashfs compression used to make the linuxfs file (but there could be other issues as well).

Please try again with the "bp=e" option. This will get you to a shell when the error occurs. Then run "dmesg | tail -n20". This will likely tell us more about what is going on.

Once the bootloader has run (and read the vmlinuz and initrd.gz files) then our fragmentation woes are over. The Linux kernel has no problem reading fragmented files so I suspect the problem is the compression method.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool."

-- Richard Feynman

rs55
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:24 pm

Re: antiX live usb issue

#98 Post by rs55 »

fehlix wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:22 pm
rs55 wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:05 pm If fuseiso* is only causing a problem for a certain subset of machines ( like mine), but necessary for other machines, then perhaps you could make fuseiso* optional, or at least allow users to uninstall it.(as it used to be prior to this latest version).
Please verify that it works for you with disabling fuseiso from command line like this:

Code: Select all

sudo live-usb-maker  --force=nofuse 
Probably this can also be set permanently into the saved configfile.
Yes - it works with the command line and force=nofuse.
It would be great if the gui for LUM had a checkbox for fuse/nofuse. I dont think Iam the only one this issue with fuse- I believe dolphin was also having the same issue.

Where is the config file for LUM and how do I change it?

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 12693
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: antiX live usb issue

#99 Post by fehlix »

rs55 wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:51 pm Where is the config file for LUM and how do I change it?
I havn't tested the save config settings feature. But if you run live-usb-maker --help
such an option is mentioned. Need to check... :snail:

User avatar
BitJam
Developer
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:36 pm

Re: antiX live usb issue

#100 Post by BitJam »

@rs55, please run LUM again with fuse enabled. When you boot, please add these two options:

Code: Select all

checkmd5  bp=e
The first will check the integrity of the linuxfs file before we try to mount it. The 2nd will get you to a shell when the error occurs. In the shell run the command:

Code: Select all

dmesg | tail -n20
This should tell us why the mount failed. You could possible take a picture of the output if that is easy for you and it seems warranted.

If we are still getting fragmentation problems and we can't fix them then we may have to change our strategy and only use fuse when normal mounting fails. If I do give up then that will mean there will be some (rare) systems that LUM will not work on which is not a desirable outcome.

I want to first find out exactly what the problem is and then deal with it.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool."

-- Richard Feynman

Post Reply

Return to “Software / Configuration”