Distrowatch review grumbles
Re: Distrowatch reveiw grumbles
Do we have any devs/testers who have a very high dpi laptop like this? When I got a high dpi laptop with a 1920x1080 display I ended up writing code to automatically adjust the console font size so it was usable on the first live boot. I think we may want to do something similar for X-windows especially for the ultra high dpi like what this user has. I've discussed this with fehlix and he has some ideas on how to do it but I think we need someone with an ultra high dpi laptop to test it on (although in theory perhaps we can get by with what we have now).
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool."
-- Richard Feynman
-- Richard Feynman
Re: Distrowatch reveiw grumbles
We also have XFCE themes that are suitable for xhdpi that come with the ISO or can be installed, so I don't think that's a problem, but maybe the system could somehow use those automatically if it does detect an xhdpi screen, or at least offer a setup wizard even before MX Welcome runs, like Enlightenment does.
Re: Distrowatch reveiw grumbles
I have the XPS13 that you are familiar with:I that what you are talking about?
Code: Select all
$ inxi -G
Graphics: Device-1: Intel HD Graphics 5500 driver: i915 v: kernel
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.19.2 driver: modesetting unloaded: fbdev,vesa
resolution: 1920x1080~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel HD Graphics 5500 (Broadwell GT2) v: 4.5 Mesa 18.2.6
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Re: Distrowatch reveiw grumbles
Probably the even higher Dpi screens, like Galago Pro's option for a 3200 × 1800 HiDPI display.Jerry3904 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:30 pm I have the XPS13 that you are familiar with:I that what you are talking about?Code: Select all
$ inxi -G Graphics: Device-1: Intel HD Graphics 5500 driver: i915 v: kernel Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.19.2 driver: modesetting unloaded: fbdev,vesa resolution: 1920x1080~60Hz OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel HD Graphics 5500 (Broadwell GT2) v: 4.5 Mesa 18.2.6
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
Re: Distrowatch reveiw grumbles
Maybe the setup app could have bitmap images on big buttons of what the fonts and icons are going to look like at various dpi and style settings, and ask the user to click the one that looks the best (in a large enough font). So the stock ones will look small on an hdpi screen and tiny on an xhdpi one. The bigger ones if clicked could then change the font dpi, the xfce window style theme and decorations, the icon size in Thunar, the panel width and maximum icon size in the Notification panel item, the font size in the panel clock, and the icon size in Whisker menu. These are all things that I need to adjust for a 1080 laptop screen anyway, so I know it must be worse on a 2160 laptop.
I don't think any of the dev team has an 4K xhdpi laptop, but I'm sure at least some of our users must.
I don't think any of the dev team has an 4K xhdpi laptop, but I'm sure at least some of our users must.
Re: Distrowatch reveiw grumbles
A setup app that runs before MX Welcome is an excellent idea.
I don't have a high DPI monitor so I have to ask a question. If switch my monitor over to a 4K model would everything appear too small when using MX? If this is the case then I see baking the setup app into MX tweak as being useful for users.

I don't have a high DPI monitor so I have to ask a question. If switch my monitor over to a 4K model would everything appear too small when using MX? If this is the case then I see baking the setup app into MX tweak as being useful for users.
Re: Distrowatch reveiw grumbles
I have one but I've put Windows 10 back on it and it's for sale. I could do some testing on it with MX booted from a live USB though, until somebody buys it that is. It's an Acer Zenbook 3200x1800 and a 13.3" screen.Stevo wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:44 pm Maybe the setup app could have bitmap images on big buttons of what the fonts and icons are going to look like at various dpi and style settings, and ask the user to click the one that looks the best (in a large enough font). So the stock ones will look small on an hdpi screen and tiny on an xhdpi one. The bigger ones if clicked could then change the font dpi, the xfce window style theme and decorations, the icon size in Thunar, the panel width and maximum icon size in the Notification panel item, the font size in the panel clock, and the icon size in Whisker menu. These are all things that I need to adjust for a 1080 laptop screen anyway, so I know it must be worse on a 2160 laptop.
I don't think any of the dev team has an 4K xhdpi laptop, but I'm sure at least some of our users must.
Code: Select all
$ inxi -G
Graphics: Device-1: Intel HD Graphics 520 driver: i915 v: kernel
Device-2: NVIDIA GM108M [GeForce 940M] driver: nouveau v: kernel
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.19.2 driver: modesetting,nouveau unloaded: fbdev,vesa
resolution: 3200x1800~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel HD Graphics 520 (Skylake GT2) v: 4.5 Mesa 18.2.6
Last edited by JayM on Sun Mar 31, 2019 4:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.
Re: Distrowatch reveiw grumbles
Well, yes, everything will be smaller. It's really bad on the small 4K screens, like you might find on an 11 in laptop. Not so bad if you have a 30 inch 4K monitor.colin_b wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 9:30 pm A setup app that runs before MX Welcome is an excellent idea.
![]()
I don't have a high DPI monitor so I have to ask a question. If switch my monitor over to a 4K model would everything appear too small when using MX? If this is the case then I see baking the setup app into MX tweak as being useful for users.
Re: Distrowatch reveiw grumbles
If you have something that can be live to test, I can do with an LG 27BK85U-W 16:9 Resolution 3840 x 2160. It's not hook to any computer I have but I know I can boot up a usb to test it, not install it. I have been trying to get him to test MX but not yet. Since I don't always login an email to me would be better.
It is easier to fight for one's principles then to live up to them.
Re: Distrowatch reveiw grumbles
A nice review, except they didn't bother to find out about a current claws-mail in the test repo:

And your regularly scheduled troll:Version: 18.1
Rating: 9
Date: 2019-03-24
Votes: 3
Really impressive, easy to install but just as good from a USB stick. Debian based so huge software base available. Boot is fast stability in my experience impeccable on both older and quite new hardware.
The MX snapshot tool is fantastic, I installed on my desktop PC, installed the additional software which I prefer, customized my desktop then setup claws mail with my accounts, claws was anchient so updated from debian backports. Then I made a backup and a snapshot.
The snapshot which I put on a on usb stick not only runs on my desktop PC it even booted and ran on my T420 Laptop. I was amazed as the hardware is totally different..
Wishes, Claws Mail in newer Version. Reminder to activate Firewall on welcome screen. Firefox as delivered with Data Reporting opt in.
Try it I think you will be very impressed.
so this guy is whining about a dependency of libnss-mdms, which we just added because it allows a multitude of printers to just work out of the box and closes a lot of bug reports.Version: 18.1
Rating: 3
Date: 2019-03-25
Votes: 0
- Why all these new dependencies? avahi-daemon for example. please don't fall into the trap of Peter's principle. 17.1 is the best distro there is.
Pros: fast and light.
Cons: unstable and therefore insecure. All that remains is your tools which are wonderful but it is not enough to have a quality distro.
- Pourquoi toutes ces nouvelles dependances? avahi-daemon par exemple. svp MX team, ne tombez pas dans le piege du principe de Peter. 17.1 est la meilleure distro qui existe.
Pros: rapide et legère.
Cons: instable et donc insecure. il ne reste que vos outils qui sont merveilleux mais c'est insuffisant pour avoir une distro de qualité.

Last edited by Stevo on Tue Mar 26, 2019 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.