MX-18 Feedback

Message
Author
User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 23350
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: MX-18 Feedback

#131 Post by Jerry3904 »

It's not easier on the people that have to answer and then later use the info for development.

Maybe we should set up a Wiki article on "How to report a bug on the MX Bug Manager." I'll look into that.
Production: MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

User avatar
Gordon Cooper
Posts: 965
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:50 pm

Re: MX-18 Feedback

#132 Post by Gordon Cooper »

Jerry3904 wrote: Sun Dec 23, 2018 2:06 pm It's not easier on the people that have to answer and then later use the info for development.

Maybe we should set up a Wiki article on "How to report a bug on the MX Bug Manager." I'll look into that.
Yes, a good thought. How to use Bugzilla is not immediately obvious.
Backup: Dell9010, MX-19_B2, Win7, 120 SSD, WD 232GIB HD, 4GB RAM
Primary :Homebrew64 bit Intel duo core 2 GB RAM, 120 GB Kingston SSD, Seagate1TB.
MX-18.2 64bit. Also MX17, Kubuntu14.04 & Puppy 6.3.

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7994
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: MX-18 Feedback

#133 Post by asqwerth »

beardedgeek72 wrote: Sun Dec 23, 2018 8:26 am
asqwerth wrote: Sun Dec 23, 2018 7:38 am
Only quoting this bit, but replying to both posts.

What I can find are Synaptic, of course, but then two graphical that looks identical when opened but have different icons and different names: The MX one, and one with a red Debian logo on it and called something else. Installed as a separate packagebut looks absolutely identical as the MX one when opened.
And then the text based one, yes. Four in total.

As for bloated: I don't mind wallpapers, I am a wallpaperoholic myself.
....
Edit:
I tried Synaptic first. And then the MX one. It was Synaptic that when klicking the check button listed Firefox and four other packages as being held back; I did not try to force the issue, I just noticed that when I did the auto detected updates they suddenly were eligible to be upgraded.
Yup, only 2 gui front-end programs (synaptic and mxpi) that essentially use the apt terminal commands.

The one with the red Debian glyph is actually a program (gdebi) to directly install .deb binary executable files, like double clicking on a .Exe file in Windows.

And visually the gdebi interface does not look like mxpi at all.

By the way I posted a 3rd post, to ask if you had manually refreshed package lists in synaptic. You might have opened synaptic before the behind the scenes auto updater had finished checking for updates or some repo mirrors were not yet synced.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

RichardTS
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2018 6:46 pm

Re: MX-18 Feedback

#134 Post by RichardTS »

Some may remember my wireless issues on my Lenovo Yoga 730 with MX-18 rc1 from last week. Well, that’s all in the rear view mirror now. Downloaded MX-18 Final and installed it the way I used to with Ubuntu back in the days of all the Broadcom wireless issues and everything worked perfectly. The trick? ALWAYS install with an Ethernet network connection. Just always seems to work better. It must be downloading wireless components while installing.

MX-18 works great now!

TJ Hoye
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:21 pm

Re: MX-18 Feedback

#135 Post by TJ Hoye »

Minor problem with FF64 in MX18 not found in MX17.1 fully upgraded.

My MX18 FF64 does not display some html input boxes properly.
My MX18 Chromium doesn't have this same problem, but I'd rather be using FF64.
Only problem I've noticed so far with MX18.

Unlike MX17.1, MX18 FF64 Help says FF updates disabled by sys admin.
Last edited by TJ Hoye on Tue Dec 25, 2018 11:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
64-bit MX -19.1 Samsung LiveUSB on Dell quad-core laptop

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 23350
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: MX-18 Feedback

#136 Post by Jerry3904 »

It may say that for the first time, but we have been handling FF updates ourselves since the beginning.
Production: MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22481
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: MX-18 Feedback

#137 Post by dolphin_oracle »

Jerry3904 wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 11:07 am It may say that for the first time, but we have been handling FF updates ourselves since the beginning.
what he said.

what happened was that firefox settings changed along the way and our custom settings file no longer addressed it. It does not, but existing installs probably won't see the change because of the way things work with settings in the home folder.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
Live system help document: https://mxlinux.org/wiki/help-antix-live-usb-system/

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 14739
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:07 pm

Re: MX-18 Feedback

#138 Post by Stevo »

CaputAlista wrote: Sun Dec 23, 2018 5:48 am The situation of the high RAM consumption in live cd in mx 18, apparently, is due to the kernel.
The mx 17 that does not give problems and when updating the kernel to 4.19.10-antix1-amd-smp I had the same problems.
Can I put a kernel in mx 18 as under the snapshot mx17 on October 20? Thanks
Yes, that should not be a problem.

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 14739
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:07 pm

Re: MX-18 Feedback

#139 Post by Stevo »

dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 11:12 am
Jerry3904 wrote: Tue Dec 25, 2018 11:07 am It may say that for the first time, but we have been handling FF updates ourselves since the beginning.
what he said.

what happened was that firefox settings changed along the way and our custom settings file no longer addressed it. It does not, but existing installs probably won't see the change because of the way things work with settings in the home folder.
We just now added a json file to our Firefox install that disabled the update nag and the message that an attempted upgrade failed, so we won't see those any more, thanks to fehlix. It does mean that we now will see that message about updates being disabled. It's not MX 18 specific.

User avatar
KBD
Posts: 959
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: MX-18 Feedback

#140 Post by KBD »

Preparing to install to an SSD and booted up live to check the usb. Just wanted to say this looks freaking awesome, especially Conky. It looks perfect on my 12" laptop. I can see you tweaked and polished it a bit compared to MX 17. Great job folks!

Post Reply

Return to “General”