Beta Manual feedback

Topics relating to MX Docs and MX Videos
Message
Author
User avatar
lucky9
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:54 am

Re: Beta Manual feedback

#41 Post by lucky9 »

Since you're bringing up a vanilla MX 14.x that's a good find.

I didn't have to specifically install kmenuedit. I did pretty much follow the protocol that joany put out. I also followed Danum's recent KDE post. I've found that I have to Unlock Widgets to have it available. Not sure that was always so.

But I've also added this and that along the way so it could have been connected as a dependency to something. Sometimes dependencies don't make a lot of sense. I know that having the Backports repository enabled has some problems for me at least. I've been told that I have broken packages. None appear if I ask Synaptic to show them. I resorted to aptitude -f install. It took several iterations to clear the 'broken packages'. But they did clear up.
Yes, even I am dishonest. Not in many ways, but in some. Forty-one, I think it is.
--Mark Twain

User avatar
uncle mark
Posts: 853
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:42 pm

Re: Beta Manual feedback

#42 Post by uncle mark »

I had just done a new, fresh install of MX-14.3, updated, installed KDE-Standard, and then did some basic tweaking and configuring based on Joany's tips and a few things that had been posted in the MX-KDE forum. The absence of the menu editor didn't seem to be addressed anywhere (that I saw, anyway).

I normally don't install MX for any of my "converts" -- for my users, a KDE desktop with all the tweaks and additions I was used to seeing in MEPIS has been best. That's what I'm hoping to achieve with this latest install.
Custom build Asus/AMD/nVidia circa 2011 -- MX 19.2 KDE
Acer Aspire 5250 -- MX 21 KDE
Toshiba Satellite C55 -- MX 18.3 Xfce
Assorted Junk -- assorted Linuxes

User avatar
kmathern
Developer
Posts: 2515
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:26 pm

Re: Beta Manual feedback

#43 Post by kmathern »

kmenuedit could probably be added to the FLL_PACKAGES section of the /usr/share/mx-packageinstaller/bm/WindowManager-kde4_standard.bm file

Code: Select all

$ FLL_PACKAGES=(
          kde-standard
          #kdm
          virtuoso-minimal
          kmenuedit
)
Are there any other KDE4 packages that should be installed?

User avatar
lucky9
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:54 am

Re: Beta Manual feedback

#44 Post by lucky9 »

K3b has to be added, at least for me.
Yes, even I am dishonest. Not in many ways, but in some. Forty-one, I think it is.
--Mark Twain

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 23118
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Beta Manual feedback

#45 Post by Jerry3904 »

Probably a good addition for anybody wanting to run KDE on MX.
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

User avatar
uncle mark
Posts: 853
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:42 pm

Re: Beta Manual feedback

#46 Post by uncle mark »

What about kdm? Not necessary, but from a cosmetic standpoint...
Custom build Asus/AMD/nVidia circa 2011 -- MX 19.2 KDE
Acer Aspire 5250 -- MX 21 KDE
Toshiba Satellite C55 -- MX 18.3 Xfce
Assorted Junk -- assorted Linuxes

User avatar
kmathern
Developer
Posts: 2515
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:26 pm

Re: Beta Manual feedback

#47 Post by kmathern »

uncle mark wrote:What about kdm? Not necessary, but from a cosmetic standpoint...
kdm is in the WindowManager-kde4_standard.bm file, but is commented out. I'm not exactly sure why.

User avatar
anticapitalista
Developer
Posts: 4285
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: Beta Manual feedback

#48 Post by anticapitalista »

kmathern wrote:
uncle mark wrote:What about kdm? Not necessary, but from a cosmetic standpoint...
kdm is in the WindowManager-kde4_standard.bm file, but is commented out. I'm not exactly sure why.
Because user input is needed to select the default login manager, but it isn't (wasn't) showing up in the mx-packageinstaller 'screen'
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
uncle mark
Posts: 853
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:42 pm

Re: Beta Manual feedback

#49 Post by uncle mark »

Before we get scolded, this is moving away from feedback on the Manual.

Perhaps a new topic for KDE-Standard "enhancements" or some such for MX-15?
Custom build Asus/AMD/nVidia circa 2011 -- MX 19.2 KDE
Acer Aspire 5250 -- MX 21 KDE
Toshiba Satellite C55 -- MX 18.3 Xfce
Assorted Junk -- assorted Linuxes

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 23118
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Beta Manual feedback

#50 Post by Jerry3904 »

Development note: all feedback up to this point has been taken into account in a new version (20150307) being uploaded now. Make sure to refresh the page and check to see the new version number.

I will close this thread and open a new one in a short while--thanks to every one for the terrific help!
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

Locked

Return to “Documentation and videos”