Yeah, it doesn't matter much what Dedoimedo or anyone else says if the release works well for the person using it.karieho wrote:As Blogspot says "I rate MX-14 as one of the most functional XFCE 4 distros I have used. It is fast, stable and efficient."
For me and my wife it is best distro. It just works! Perhaps it is best not to wait for new reviews (or ignore what Dedo says) and focus only on to use it.
I don't think Dedoimedo likes Debian very much -- I couldn't find any more recent Debian reviews than his ones of Debian 5.03 "Squeeze" (http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/debian.html) and Debian 6 "Lenny" (http://dedoimedo.com/computers/debian-6.html), both of which I enjoyed running here, and both of which he didn't care for, to put things mildly!
And, I checked out his review of CrunchBang 11 "Waldorf" (http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/crun ... ldorf.html). Fairly positive review. That's cool; I like CrunchBang 11 and everything. But I don't think that it's as much better than MX-14 as his reviews might lead one to believe; it's different out-of-the-box and it comes with its own pros and cons, but for me it was kind of a toss-up between keeping Waldorf on my low-spec computer or replacing it with MX-14 (I kept CrunchBang, but one seemed as good as the other).
I'd be interested to see what he has to say about Wheezy Xfce, which I use now on my primary computer. I think he'd probably rip it; I don't think it's along the lines of what he likes, especially out-of-the-box. But to me, it's wonderful.
So I'd say take Dedoimedo's reviews with a grain of salt, if you can; if you can get any useful info from them, do that. Beyond that, just keep trying to make MX better. Remember, this is only the first release, and it's an excellent start; its users are happy, and that's the important thing.