
MX-14 beta 2
- Eadwine Rose
- Administrator
- Posts: 14490
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:10 am
Re: MX-14 beta 2
Just discovered.. Menu-multimedia-codecs.


MX-23.6_x64 July 31 2023 * 6.1.0-35amd64 ext4 Xfce 4.20.0 * 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.247.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.247.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030
Re: MX-14 beta 2
The transparent themes don't work in KDE. I wish they did. GkrellM is one of the first things I install in a new system, so I'm glad to hear that the transparency works in MX-14.golinuxgo wrote:I also find gkrellm useful. Not for the moonphase but for the reminder plugin. Events can be set for every x number of days (not just weekly, monthly etc), plays music as a reminder (in addition to a popup) and you can reset the reminder for x hours later on the fly to keep reminding you until it gets done. It's a very pleasant nag. Thanks for the transparent themes.BitJam wrote:GKrellM is a system monitor like Conky. Perhaps it is showing its age but it is usually one of the very first apps I install because without it it feels like I'm flying blind.
It has plenty of other tricks. I've attached a small tarball that contains 3 slightly different invisible themes. I have almost 200 themes installed but I much prefer the invisible themes because they work well with almost any bg image.
*edit* The transparent themes you posted are not transparent here. Are they transparent only for the moonclock?
Green Comet
Space particles.
Space particles.
Re: MX-14 beta 2
Because of that it looks out of place in KDE. The native widgets look much better. I will have to try it in MX.arjaybe wrote:
The transparent themes don't work in KDE. I wish they did. GkrellM is one of the first things I install in a new system, so I'm glad to hear that the transparency works in MX-14.
EDIT: Yes looks much better in MX with transparency.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help
richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB
Guide - How to Ask for Help
richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB
- entropyfoe
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:42 am
Re:GParted in MX-14 beta 2 wouldn't load
OK, a bit more research on partitioning my old PATA drive.
I booted Puppy Live CD (old 5.4.3 I think) and I was able to run GParted. I made a traditional ext3, swap, ext3 partition scheme for /, swap and /home.
Not sure why GParted locked with MX-14. But now I have a correctly partitioned disk, and I will try an install or MX-14 on that drive. Will report later.
-Jay
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Earlier post
The beta2 booted into a live session (beta 1 did not) on my old A7N8X mother board.
OK, so I found an old PATA drive in the parts bin and installed it so I could install MX-14.
This old machine has a working XP installation on a SATA drive that I have disconnected the power on so it is undisturbed.
From the live session, I can see the new PATA drive and access the files. But I cannot launch GParted to repartition the drive.
I supply root credentials an d everything locks up, no mouse cursor nothing works until I Ctrl Shift SysRq REISUB.
So, then I tried to install, thinking I could partition as part of the install, but when I get to the part to modify partitions, same lock up.
Any ideas what to try?
Has anyone used GParted from the beta2 live session?
-Jay
I booted Puppy Live CD (old 5.4.3 I think) and I was able to run GParted. I made a traditional ext3, swap, ext3 partition scheme for /, swap and /home.
Not sure why GParted locked with MX-14. But now I have a correctly partitioned disk, and I will try an install or MX-14 on that drive. Will report later.
-Jay
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Earlier post
The beta2 booted into a live session (beta 1 did not) on my old A7N8X mother board.
OK, so I found an old PATA drive in the parts bin and installed it so I could install MX-14.
This old machine has a working XP installation on a SATA drive that I have disconnected the power on so it is undisturbed.
From the live session, I can see the new PATA drive and access the files. But I cannot launch GParted to repartition the drive.
I supply root credentials an d everything locks up, no mouse cursor nothing works until I Ctrl Shift SysRq REISUB.
So, then I tried to install, thinking I could partition as part of the install, but when I get to the part to modify partitions, same lock up.
Any ideas what to try?
Has anyone used GParted from the beta2 live session?
-Jay
MX 23.5 on Asus PRIME X470-PRO
AMD Ryzen 3600X (12 threads @ 3.8 GHz)
32 Gig DDR4 3600 (Crucial CL 16)
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Samsung 970 NVMe nvme0n1 P1-3=MX-23.5, P4=testing
Samsung 980 NVMe =1TB Data, plus 2TB WD =backups
on-board ethernet & sound
AMD Ryzen 3600X (12 threads @ 3.8 GHz)
32 Gig DDR4 3600 (Crucial CL 16)
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Samsung 970 NVMe nvme0n1 P1-3=MX-23.5, P4=testing
Samsung 980 NVMe =1TB Data, plus 2TB WD =backups
on-board ethernet & sound
Re: MX-14 beta 2
The transparency is for the entire gkrellm, but only if you don't use a compositor.golinuxgo wrote:*edit* The transparent themes you posted are not transparent here (on refracta xfce). Are they transparent only for the moonclock?
IIUC there is a general conflict between psuedo transparency and compositing. Some years ago there was also a conflict between tearing video and compositing (at least with Nvidia drivers) so I choose to go with an non-compositing desktop since non-tearing video playback was high on my priority list while wobbly windows, not so much.
If you are using a compositor then true transparency should be available, where you can see other windows behind a transparent window. TBH, I think I like visual effect of pseudo-transparency better, otherwise the bg in the transparent window gets too noisy. For example, I tend to use only dark bg images but many windows have light backgrounds.
Re: MX-14 beta 2
Ah! That explains it. Once I got the nvidia driver working, I enabled XFCE's simple compositor because I like transparency when I move windows. I'll look at your themes and try to tweak them a bit - I'm usually pretty good at that kind of thing. (Unless you take it on first!) :DBitJam wrote:The transparency is for the entire gkrellm, but only if you don't use a compositor.golinuxgo wrote:*edit* The transparent themes you posted are not transparent here (on refracta xfce). Are they transparent only for the moonclock?
IIUC there is a general conflict between psuedo transparency and compositing. Some years ago there was also a conflict between tearing video and compositing (at least with Nvidia drivers) so I choose to go with an non-compositing desktop since non-tearing video playback was high on my priority list while wobbly windows, not so much.
If you are using a compositor then true transparency should be available, where you can see other windows behind a transparent window. TBH, I think I like visual effect of pseudo-transparency better, otherwise the bg in the transparent window gets too noisy. For example, I tend to use only dark bg images but many windows have light backgrounds.
*Edit* OK I just disabled XFCE compositing and the transparency still didn't display. :( It would have been a nice option . . .
(That's the way life is.)
Re: MX-14 beta 2
I don't think tweaking the themes will help with transparency when a compositor is being used.golinuxgo wrote:Ah! That explains it. Once I got the nvidia driver working, I enabled XFCE's simple compositor because I like transparency when I move windows. I'll look at your themes and try to tweak them a bit - I'm usually pretty good at that kind of thing. (Unless you take it on first!) :D
This page: http://www.muhri.net/gkrellm/ has a link to a tarball with almost 200 themes in it. If you want to go non-transparent then their tarball contains a bunch of good starting points.
AFAIK, you need to give up pseudo-transparency when you use a compositor. You can't just tweak the pseudo-transparent apps. I'd love for you to prove me wrong.
- Eadwine Rose
- Administrator
- Posts: 14490
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:10 am
Re: MX-14 beta 2
Just a big thankyou to the person who got Lbreakout2 to be in the games. Just discovered it was there 

MX-23.6_x64 July 31 2023 * 6.1.0-35amd64 ext4 Xfce 4.20.0 * 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.247.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.247.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030
Re: MX-14 beta 2
me, me, me
Did you try Chromium BSU?
Did you try Chromium BSU?
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
- anticapitalista
- Developer
- Posts: 4285
- Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am
Re: MX-14 beta 2
But you nicked it from antiX :) We have had it for several releases.
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com
Reg. linux user #395339.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com