Now for some feedback:
Roadblock wrote:Great work guys.![]()
A small thing: My post count seems to be substantially lower. I don't mind that, but it also changed the title under my online status from "Mepis Guide" to "Mepis Rules" as well as the number of pyramids showing. I don't mind that either, I just noticed it and thought I would point it out in case it happened to anyone else.
If this has already been discussed, I apologize in advance.
I think these 2 things work together as well. I understand the need/desire for archiving the older posts, but having my post count cut by more than half and seeing my reputation down to 0 was a bit disheartening. Maybe it's just the egocentrist in me;) Personally I have used both these numbers to judge the experience and respect a poster has.Brooko wrote:No hurry - Karen's aware and we'll have a look at the old VB when she's had a break. I expect the 600 active members will actually be fewer, as a lot of them will be spammers who haven't posted or users with under 10 posts (so have no rep anyway).richb wrote:Edit all 3000 plus members or 600 plus active members! Big task. I believe that data is available in a copy of VB that Karen has. Not sure if it is in a concise usable format, however.
I'm guessing it will probably be only around 100-150 manual edits - and I could do them over a few days once I get the data. I might also be able to have a look at pruning any other obvious non-members (old spammers who slipped through) while I'm doing it.
I also noticed that just giving a person "Thanks" does not add to the "Reputation" the way the old system did.
I'm glad to see this is being looked into.richb wrote:Thank you, Yes, we noted that in the test phase. A module addition would be required as it is not in the base software. It is on a desired feature list.kmathern wrote:One thing I've noticed is that the original post in a thread and it's replies aren't given post numbers like they were in the old forum.
For instance I think my reply in this thread is post #33.
In the old forum you could refer someone to a particular post in a thread by its number.
A couple more things I've noticed are missing, and am not sure if they are even available in the new system.
First, the multi-quote option within a thread. I have several quotes here from this thread, which was a pain to compile. Doable, and not something done often, but it sure was a nice feature.
Second, the quote link. Previously if you hit the quote button, it would provide a link to the quoted text. This was especially nice if you were quoting from a different thread.
Overall, I think it's a good step forward. I'm sure there will be things along the way that will need ironing out. Old features missing and not replicable. New features that were never available. And it sounds like the backend will be easier to maintain. A big bonus to the people behind the scenes, and something us users rarely think about.
Thanks again for all the work done.
Al