COMPLETELY systemd-free "MX?"  [Solved]

Message
Author
User avatar
Artim
Posts: 339
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:04 am

COMPLETELY systemd-free "MX?"

#1 Post by Artim »

I just found this article about the newest version of systemd, boasting "42% less UNIX philosophy," and it has me wondering:

A couple of years ago I added Xfce to antiX (using the antix way, not Synaptic) and kind of had a "truly systemd-free MX-ish Linux." I did it back then because it didn't make sense that MX "has" systemd but "doesn't use it" except as a dependency. Now I'm thinking about it again after reading this article.

What commands would I use after installing antiX-core to "build" an Xfce system (without systemd or elogind)? Is there a script I might copy-and-paste (still pretty technophobic when it comes to the CLI) or can I possibly just use "full," install Xfce, and uninstall the other window managers?

OR, instead of a full desktop environment like Xfce, I wonder if I really need all FOUR window managers? Could I install just one?

Thanks

User avatar
anticapitalista
Developer
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: COMPLETELY systemd-free "MX?"

#2 Post by anticapitalista »

It used to be possible to turn an installed MX Xfce to completely systemd-free by adding the full antiX repos.
Haven't tried it for a while though.
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
Artim
Posts: 339
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:04 am

Re: COMPLETELY systemd-free "MX?"

#3 Post by Artim »

Thank you! I'm still on MX-21, and in no hurry, but instead of downloading and installing MX-23 I'm thinking about antiX again, maybe with Xfce, or maybe I'll just learn Icewm, which can't be that hard to figure out.

I've had a look at @manyroads's Xfce respin of antiX and that's how I might go if Icewm doesn't fit the bill, so I've got my answer to the first question ("can I install Xfce and get rid of the other WMs"). But the second question remains: If/since I'll like choose Icewm, can the other WMs be safely uninstalled?

Thanks again!

User avatar
anticapitalista
Developer
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: COMPLETELY systemd-free "MX?"  [Solved]

#4 Post by anticapitalista »

You can safely remove the window managers you do not want/need.
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
trawglodyte
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2024 7:35 am

Re: COMPLETELY systemd-free "MX?"

#5 Post by trawglodyte »

anticapitalista wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2024 8:09 am You can safely remove the window managers you do not want/need.
I might give putting Moksha desktop (branch of Enlightenment) on antiX a shot. It worked on Puppy Linux (Bookworm_10.04). Any tips for me? Or just try and see what happens? I don't have anything against IceWM or JWM for that matter, it's just a fun project. Moksha does rip though!! I love that desktop.

Post Reply

Return to “antiX”