I just started experiencing the same thing -- ie, black screen after waking up from sleep, only cursor can be seen -- but it was on my existing MX23 KDE (so it's not mx23 xfce like the OP, nor a fresh install), after installing updates yesterday .
I won't insert my issues into this thread but will ...
Search found 4904 matches
- Mon Jul 28, 2025 4:15 am
- Forum: MX Help
- Topic: new MX install wont wake up from sleep
- Replies: 16
- Views: 482
- Sat Jul 26, 2025 11:04 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Homebank 5.9.2 in trixie is broken [Solved]
- Replies: 8
- Views: 289
Re: Homebank 5.9.2 in trixie is broken [Solved]
I don't think we are supporting trixie or devuan excalibur.
It doesn't matter that you are adding mx25 ALPHA repos.
It doesn't matter that you are adding mx25 ALPHA repos.
Re: New user
I don't do desktop publishing, but I would assume a relevant question is whether you wish to bring over template/data files from your current DTP program. If that is a proprietary program, you will need to check whether the devs of that program have a Linux version of that program, or whether there ...
- Tue Jul 22, 2025 9:06 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Which Version of MX to install?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 827
Re: Which Version of MX to install?
I'm very happy with MBR on my 2015 multiboot PC. No Windows on this at all.
Boot mode per QSI is
Boot Mode: BIOS (legacy, CSM, MBR)
MBR is on a SSD with legacy msdos partition table.
My other devices are HDD with GPT. All distros on either the SSD or HDD all boot and run just fine.
Not saying ...
Boot mode per QSI is
Boot Mode: BIOS (legacy, CSM, MBR)
MBR is on a SSD with legacy msdos partition table.
My other devices are HDD with GPT. All distros on either the SSD or HDD all boot and run just fine.
Not saying ...
- Mon Jul 21, 2025 11:43 am
- Forum: MX Help
- Topic: manually run dpkg --configure -a
- Replies: 9
- Views: 517
Re: manually run dpkg --configure -a
There is a Debian 11 repo enabled on this Debian 12/MX23 (32-bit) installation.
- Sun Jul 13, 2025 11:29 pm
- Forum: Older Versions
- Topic: unable to update flatpaks [Solved]
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1036
Re: unable to update flatpaks [Solved]
Manuk
The Flathub remote (flatpak's name for repos with flatpak apps) -- which is a non-Debian, third party repo -- still exists and is in use, but the flatpak platform installed in Debian 9 is so old that it probably does not sync up with the latest iterations of flatpak protocols and commands ...
The Flathub remote (flatpak's name for repos with flatpak apps) -- which is a non-Debian, third party repo -- still exists and is in use, but the flatpak platform installed in Debian 9 is so old that it probably does not sync up with the latest iterations of flatpak protocols and commands ...
- Sun Jul 06, 2025 11:24 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: MX Package UPDATER Appearance [Solved]
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1500
Re: MX Package Installer Appearance [Solved]
Ironfighter
This has nothing to do with themimg. It also does NOT have anything to do with MX PackageInstaller. So your title and original post is misleading.
This appears to be the terminal output that happens when you use MX-UPDATER.
No wonder all us helpers were so confused. We thought you ...
This has nothing to do with themimg. It also does NOT have anything to do with MX PackageInstaller. So your title and original post is misleading.
This appears to be the terminal output that happens when you use MX-UPDATER.
No wonder all us helpers were so confused. We thought you ...
- Sun Jul 06, 2025 11:11 pm
- Forum: Chat
- Topic: Is Linux fighting back?
- Replies: 49
- Views: 2588
Re: Is Linux fighting back?
Aceediq
Regarding PCLinuxOS being a more managed rolling distro, I think they probably mainly worry about foundational changes, like gtk or Qt version changes, or major releases of Plasma, or other core packages. I have noticed over the years of updating (via Synaptic) that there will points in ...
Regarding PCLinuxOS being a more managed rolling distro, I think they probably mainly worry about foundational changes, like gtk or Qt version changes, or major releases of Plasma, or other core packages. I have noticed over the years of updating (via Synaptic) that there will points in ...
- Sat Jul 05, 2025 3:53 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: MX Package UPDATER Appearance [Solved]
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1500
Re: MX Package Installer Appearance [Solved]
It's hard for me to envisage what you mean by the second system having "many colours" if the theme is the same. What about the icons? Are you using the same icon set?
Could you use your phone to take photos of the second machine's desktop or MX tweak window or whatever element you are referring to ...
Could you use your phone to take photos of the second machine's desktop or MX tweak window or whatever element you are referring to ...
- Fri Jul 04, 2025 11:24 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: MX Package UPDATER Appearance [Solved]
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1500
Re: MX Package Installer Appearance [Solved]
Is your other machine also on MX23- XFCE or KDE? What theme are you using for the other machine? Take a screenshot of your other machine so we know what you are talking about.
Since the default look for both MX XFCE and KDE is a clean light theme (mx-comfort for XFCE; Breeze + mxcomfort colour ...
Since the default look for both MX XFCE and KDE is a clean light theme (mx-comfort for XFCE; Breeze + mxcomfort colour ...