This morning's full-upgrade updated strawberry (among others) to version 1.2.13-1~mx23+1 without any action on my part.
So it seem the problem, whatever it was, has been resolved.
Thanks,
Mike
EDIT: Just noticed - probably solved as in https://forum.mxlinux.org/viewtopic.php?f=104&p=831167#p831167 ...
Search found 262 matches
- Sun Sep 07, 2025 9:59 pm
- Forum: MX Help
- Topic: strawberry held back? [Solved]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 389
- Sun Sep 07, 2025 2:06 am
- Forum: MX Help
- Topic: strawberry held back? [Solved]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 389
Re: strawberry held back? [Solved]
Is this what you mean?
MXPI shows the same
(Sorry '-' should be '~')
Mike
Synaptic shows Installed version 1.1.3-mx23+1 (and the same for latest version; version string copied by hand)$ strawberry --version
Strawberry 1.1.3
MXPI shows the same
(Sorry '-' should be '~')
Mike
- Sun Sep 07, 2025 1:46 am
- Forum: MX Help
- Topic: strawberry held back? [Solved]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 389
Re: strawberry held back? [Solved]
shows nothing, both with and without sudo
Mike
$ sudo apt-mark showhold
$ apt-mark showhold
$

Mike
- Sun Sep 07, 2025 12:11 am
- Forum: MX Help
- Topic: strawberry held back? [Solved]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 389
strawberry held back? [Solved]
To my memory I have not changed any strawberry settings
However this morning I saw:
$ sudo apt full-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
strawberry
0 upgraded ...
However this morning I saw:
$ sudo apt full-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
strawberry
0 upgraded ...
- Tue Sep 02, 2025 6:06 am
- Forum: MX Fluxbox Official Release
- Topic: Battery monitor to save battery life
- Replies: 11
- Views: 905
Re: Battery monitor to save battery life
Or using conky
add
add
to whatever conkyrc you useBattery level: $battery_percent %
- Tue Sep 02, 2025 5:56 am
- Forum: MX Help
- Topic: Super-User Nags [Solved]
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1018
Re: Super-User Nags [Solved]
Don't think of the sudo password query (or any privilege escalation) as a way of granting you supreme powers.
Think of it as the safety switch on a firearm. Would you carry one with thw safety off?
If you are prepared to barge ahead on a possibly wrong without a moment's pause for consideration ...
Think of it as the safety switch on a firearm. Would you carry one with thw safety off?
If you are prepared to barge ahead on a possibly wrong without a moment's pause for consideration ...
- Sat Aug 23, 2025 2:45 am
- Forum: Package Requests - MX-23
- Topic: request update of yt-dlp [Solved]
- Replies: 21
- Views: 4405
Re: request update of yt-dlp [Solved]
Just tried sudo yt-dlp -UMikeR wrote: Fri Aug 22, 2025 1:24 am @siamhie
Thanks, did that.
As /usr/local/bin was not in $PATH, I placed the file in /usr/bin/yt-dlp
Hoping for the best.
Mike
Success!
Thanks guys! (gals if any, included)$ yt-dlp --version
2025.08.22
Mike
- Fri Aug 22, 2025 1:24 am
- Forum: Package Requests - MX-23
- Topic: request update of yt-dlp [Solved]
- Replies: 21
- Views: 4405
Re: request update of yt-dlp [Solved]
@siamhie
Thanks, did that.
As /usr/local/bin was not in $PATH, I placed the file in /usr/bin/yt-dlp
Hoping for the best.
Mike
Thanks, did that.
As /usr/local/bin was not in $PATH, I placed the file in /usr/bin/yt-dlp
Hoping for the best.
Mike
- Thu Aug 21, 2025 10:15 pm
- Forum: Package Requests - MX-23
- Topic: request update of yt-dlp [Solved]
- Replies: 21
- Views: 4405
Re: request update of yt-dlp [Solved]
@DukeComposed
Unfortunately the version in MXPI is out of date, and does not always work (Google keeps changing the Youtube protocol)
And the recommended PPA does not add.
Sorry 'bout that
Mike
Unfortunately the version in MXPI is out of date, and does not always work (Google keeps changing the Youtube protocol)
And the recommended PPA does not add.
Sorry 'bout that
Mike