MX Linux Forum

For comparison, I also installed SeaMonkey using the Ubuntuzilla repository (despite the name, it's not an Ubuntu-specific package).

Here is the result from that test:

# hashdeep -c sha256 -k seamonkey_2.53.2-hashes.txt -s -a -v -r -o f seamonkey
hashdeep: Audit passed
Files matched: 114
Files ...

If you look in the mozilla sources for the latest seamonkey-53.2 , we don't pull from the /source folder. Instead we get our bits from inux-i686 & linux-x86_64 /en-US/ folders and snag the .bz2 files from there.


That's where I got the files I used for the comparison. I downloaded seamonkey-2.53 ...

we just repackage the prebuilt binaries from mozilla for firefox & seamonkey. they aren't true builds.


That's what I figured. But since that's the case, why are the files not the same? I compared the hash values of the files in /opt/seamonkey with those of the originals, and they don't all ...

Hi,

How is this package created? What sort of manipulations are required to take the files from the Mozilla tarball and put them into a DEB package?

Phil